Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts annual report 2007–08
Volume two
Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2008
ISSN 1441-9335
Legislation annual reports 2007-08 (continued)
Operation of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (continued)
Appendix D – Compliance with timeframes (section 518 report)
The EPBC Act and Regulations specify timeframes within which decision must be made and other actions completed. If the timeframes are not met, then in accordance with section 518 of the EPBC Act a statement must be provided setting out the reasons for the delay. Things that were not done within statutory timeframes in 2007–08 are listed in Tables 18 and 19 below.
| Section | Total | Late | Reasons for Delay |
|---|---|---|---|
| 75(5) Controlled action determination1 | 370 | 2 | Delays in obtaining sufficient information to make an informed decision |
| 77(1) Controlled action determination Notice | 368 | 29 | Delays in automated notification due to technical difficulties |
| 77(4) Statement of Reasons2 | 37 | 9 | Need to obtain legal advice/review |
| 88(1) Assessment approach decision | 82 | 35 | Delays in obtaining sufficient information to make an informed decision and the need to wait for the relevant states to provide advice as to whether or not the project would be assessed under a bilateral agreement |
| 88(2) Assessment approach decision and controlled action determination made on the same day | 108 | 2 | Need to wait for relevant states to provide advice as to whether or not the project would be assessed under a bilateral agreement |
| 93(1) Recommendation report | 2 | 1 | Need to consider all relevant material and for additional stakeholder consultation. |
| 95(1) Assessment Report1 | 6 | 5 | Need to adequately consider complex technical issues |
| 95(2)/95A(3) Direction to publish | 30 | 15 | Need to consider all relevant material and for additional stakeholder consultation |
| 95A(2) Request further information | 23 | 2 | Need to consider all relevant material and for additional stakeholder consultation |
| 95C/130(1B)(c) Recommendation report | 28 | 8 | Need for additional stakeholder consultation and to consider all relevant material. |
| 96A(4)(a) Provide Public Environmental Report guidelines to designated proponent | 3 | 2 | Need to adequately consider complex technical issues |
| 96A(4)(b) invitation to comment on a draft of tailored guidelines for the preparation of a report | 2 | 1 | Delay in reply from party invited to comment |
| 100(1) Assessment report1 | 2 | 2 | Need to adequately consider complex technical issues |
| 101A(4)(a) provide Environmental Impact Statement guidelines to designated proponent | 5 | 1 | Need to adequately consider complex technical issues |
| 102(1) Statement guidelines1 | 1 | 1 | Joint assessment with state: need to ensure both jurisdictions are satisfied with guidelines. |
| 130 (1) Approval decision1 | 15 | 8 | Need for ongoing consultation with proponent/states over content of final approval conditions. |
| 130(1B) Timing of decision on approval | 36 | 20 | Need for ongoing consultation with proponent/states over content of final approval conditions. |
| 170A(h) Internet publication of draft or finalised report/statement by a designated proponent1 | 5 | 1 | Delays in automated notification due to technical difficulties |
| 170A(i) Internet publication of each assessment report1 | 6 | 1 | Delays in automated notification due to technical difficulties |
| 170A(ia) Internet publication of each recommendation report given to the Minister | 25 | 2 | Delays in automated notification due to technical difficulties |
Notes:
1Prior to the February 2007 amendments to the EPBC Act
2Including under the AD(JR) Act
| Section | Total | Late | Reasons for Delay |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 13 Species and communities | |||
| 266B(6) Internet publication of approved conservation advice. | 9 | 9 | Administrative oversight. |
| 269AA(1) Decision whether to have a recovery plan. | 35 | 3 | Delays in providing advice to decision-maker. |
| 270A(1) Decision whether to have a threat abatement plan | 1 | 1 | Administrative oversight. |
| 279(2) Review of plans | 2 | 2 | Decision to delay review in order to seek further information. |
| Part 15 Protected areas | |||
| 324JJ(2) Decision about inclusion of a place in the National Heritage List | 21 | 11 | Principally timing of announcements to better provide for publicity for heritage listing. Of the 11 delays, 10 related to assessment reports delivered in 2006–07. |
| 341JI(2) Decision about inclusion of a place in the Commonwealth heritage list | 2 | 2 | Administrative delays. |
| Regulations | |||
| 8A.17(1) Call for register of interested people | 1 | 1 | Administrative oversight.1 |
Note:
1 Previous calls for register of interested people had no responses and no permit applications requiring public consultation.
In this section
- About this report
- Overview
- 1. Protecting environment and heritage
- 2. Conserving biodiversity
- 3. Managing heritage and protecting significant areas
- 4. Monitoring, compliance and legal actions
- 5. Reporting
- Appendix A – Statistics
- Appendix B – Committees
- Appendix C – Publications
- Appendix D – Compliance with timeframes (section 518 report)
- Case studies
Contents
Key
Links to another web site
Opens a pop-up window
