Skip to content

Annual Report 2010–11

Outcome 1: Biodiversity and ecosystems

Alternative Formats:

EPBC Act 2010–11 Annual Report (PDF 3.98MB | RTF 1.76MB)
Outcome 1: Biodiversity and ecosystems (PDF 3.98MB | RTF 1.76MB)
Full Report (PDF 59.6MB) | RTF 7.3MB)

Appendices

Print this page Increase font size Decrease font size

Appendix A—Statistics

Table 1: Overview of referrals
Referrals
2010–11
Total since
commencement
of EPBC Act in 2000
Referrals being processed at 1 July 2010
92
Total referrals received
428
3 982
Referrals withdrawn before (controlled action) decision
22
144
Referrals where a decision has been made (including reconsiderations)
400
3 744
Approval required—controlled action
150
1 022
Approval not required—action to be taken in a particular manner
104
751
Approval not required—no conditions on action
146
1 964
Action clearly unacceptable
0
7
Referrals lapsed after (controlled action) decision
6
37
Referrals withdrawn after (controlled action) decision
18
182
Referrals being processed at 30 June 2011
108
Table 2: Reconsideration of decisions
Reconsideration of decisions
Decisions
Reconsideration decisions being processed at 1 July 2010
5
Reconsideration requests received 2010–11
11
Reconsideration decisions made
Total 16
Original decision confirmed
3
Decision revoked and new decision substituted
13
Decision changed from CA to NCA
1
Decision changed from NCA to NCA
1
Decision changed from NCA to CA
1
Decision changed from NCA (particular manner) to CA
3
Decision changed from NCA (particular manner) to NCA
1
Decision changed from NCA (particular manner) to new manners              
6
Reconsiderations pending at 30 June 2011                                                            
0

Note: the indented figures reflect the breakdown of the total 16 decisions.

Table 3: Referrals and referral decisions by jurisdiction
Referrals
received
in 2010–11
 
Decisions made in 2010–11
Action clearly
unacceptable
Approval
required
Approval
not required
Total
decisions
CA
PM
NCA
Antarctica
1
 
1
1
Christmas Island
 
Cocos-Keeling Island
2
 
1
1
2
Commonwealth marine
27
 
20
2
22
Norfolk Island
 
Other Aust Territory
2
 
1
1
Other country
 
ACT
13
 
5
5
6
16
Jervis Bay Territory
 
NSW
93
 
33
8
42
83
NT
8
 
2
2
3
7
Qld
101
 
30
18
42
90
SA
16
 
6
8
2
16
Tas
14
 
6
6
4
16
Vic
71
 
17
11
35
63
WA
80
 
50
23
10
83
Total
428
 
150
104
146
400

Note: CA = controlled action; NCA = not controlled action; PM = action to be take in a particular manner

Table 4: Referrals and referral decisions by activity category
Referrals
received
in
2010–11
Decisions made in 2010–11
Action clearly
unacceptable
Approval
required
Approval not
required
Total
decisions
CA
PM
NCA
Agriculture and forestry
4
3
1
1
5
Aquaculture
Commercial development
25
13
2
7
22
Commonwealth
10
5
4
2
11
Energy generation and supply (non-renewable)
18
4
4
10
18
Energy generation and supply (renewable)
16
7
1
5
13
Exploration (mineral, oil and gas—marine)
41
1
33
1
35
Exploration (mineral, oil and gas—non-marine)
5
1
4
5
Manufacturing
1
1
Mining
75
54
4
14
72
Natural resources management
25
5
8
9
22
Private
6
1
5
6
Residential development
59
25
9
17
51
Science and research
10
1
5
4
10
Telecommunications
4
1
2
3
Tourism and recreation
14
6
6
9
21
Transport—air and space
3
1
2
3
Transport—land
60
17
9
30
56
Transport—water
10
5
3
8
Waste management (non-sewerage)
5
2
3
5
Waste management (sewerage)
11
4
1
6
11
Water management and use
27
2
4
16
22
Total
428
150
104
146
400

Note: CA = controlled action; NCA = not controlled action; PM = action to be take in a particular manner

Table 5: Decisions on assessment approach and assessments by type
Type of assess. decided in
2010–11
Assess. completed in
2010–11
Assess. withdrawn in
2010–11
Assess. lapsed in
2010–11
Recom. reports completed
in 2010–11
Recom. reports (no approval) completed in 2010–11
Assess. in progress at
30 June 2011
Recom. reports in progress at
30 June 2011
Commonwealth Assessments
Preliminary documentation
86
51
8
5
51
4
123
15
Public environment report
7
6
2
1
6
1
18
1
Referral information
13
13
0
0
13
1
3
0
Environmental impact statement
13
6
1
0
6
0
33
6
State/Territory Assessments
Bilateral assessment
14
17
4
0
0
0
94
0
Accredited process
12
5
2
0
0
0
43
0
Table 6: Approvals in 2010–11
Type of approval
Number of approvals
Number of approvals since the
commencement of the Act
Action approved
103
465
Not approved
2
10
Total decisions
105
475
Awaiting approval at 30 June 2010
18
Awaiting further information from proponent
11
Table 7: Advice requested and provided under section 160
Authorisation
provision
Requests
for advice
Advice not
required
Advice
required
Assessment
completed
Advice
provided
R6.01—Sea Dumping Permit
18
17
1
0
0
R6.01—Sea Installations Permit
0
0
0
0
0
S160—Airport Major Development Plan
4
4
0
0
0
S160—Airspace Management
0
0
0
0
0
S160—Foreign Aid
0
0
0
0
0
Table 8: Number of matters protected by the EPBC Act
Matter protected
Not controlled
action—particular manner
Controlled
action
Division 1
Matters of national environmental significance
Section 12
World Heritage values of a World Heritage listed property
5
10
Section 15B
National Heritage values of a National Heritage listed place
10
12
Section 16
Ecological character of a declared Ramsar wetland
9
16
Section 18
Listed threatened species or ecological community
81
130
Section 20
Listed migratory species
44
47
Section 21
Nuclear activities with a significant impact on the environment
1
2
Section 23
Commonwealth marine environment
33
7
Section 24B
Activities in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park
2
4
Division 2
Proposals involving the Commonwealth
Section 26
Commonwealth land
6
4
Section 27B
Activities involving Commonwealth heritage listed places overseas
0
0
Section 28
Commonwealth or Commonwealth agency activity
8
5
Total 
199
240
Table 9: Processing of nominations and changes to the list of threatened species, ecological communities and key threatening processes
Species
Ecological communities
Key threatening processes
Nominations on the 2010 Finalised Priority Assessment list
9
8
0
Items on which the Threatened Species Scientific Committee has provided advice to the minister*
50
5
3
Ministerial decisions made on Threatened Species Scientific Committee advice
47
2
0
Ministerial decisions pending on Threatened Species Scientific Committee advice
3
3
3
Number of ministerial decisions made on Threatened Species Scientific Committee advice in the following categories;
up-listed
1
0
0
down-listed
3
0
0
new
28
2
0
de-listed
13
0
0
rejected/ineligible
2
0
0
no change in status
0
0
0
Number of amendments to the list
47
2
0
Total number of listings as at 30 June 2011
1 785
50
19

* Includes ongoing assessments from the 2007, 2008 and 2009 Finalised Priority Assessment Lists. Figures include both public nominations and nominations from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee.

Table 10: Species and ecological communities covered by recovery plans (at 30 June 2010)*
Species
Ecological communities
Total
Vulnerable
Endangered
Critically endangered
Extinct in the wild
Vulnerable
Endangered
Critically
endangered
Total number of listed entities
852
673
153
1
1
31
18
1729
Number covered by plans in preparation
100
81
16
0
1
10
14
222
Number covered by plans in place
251
396
74
1
0
18
1
741
Percentage covered by plans in place or in preparation
41%
71%
59%
100%
100%
90%
83%
56%

*Note: the remaining 44% of listed species not covered by recovery plans are covered by conservation advices (see the section on Managing threatened species and ecological communities) on page 119.

Table 11: Number of recovery plans in preparation and in place at 30 June 2011
Single species
Multispecies
Ecological communities
Multiregional
Total
Number of plans in place
398
40
16
5
459
Number of plans in preparation*
102
22
24
3
151
Number of plans made or adopted in 2010–11
70
2
1
2
75
Number of plans due for adoption in 2010–11 not yet adopted**
4
0
3
0
7

Notes:

*  Does not include 29 existing plans that are being revised

** Recovery plans due for adoption in 2010–11 but not yet adopted:
Litoria booroolongensis (Booroolong Frog)
Miniopterus schreibersii bassanii (Southern bent-wing bat)
Nangura spinosa (Nangur spiny skink)
Pristis zijsron (Green sawfish)
Iron-grass Natural Temperate Grassland of South Australia
Natural Temperate Grassland of the Victorian Volcanic Plain
Peppermint Box (Eucalyptus odorata) Grassy Woodland of South Australia

Table 12: Cetacean permits-applications received and permits granted 2010–11
Sub-section of EPBC Act
Applications
received
Permits
granted
Conditions
varied or
revoked
Suspended
or cancelled
238 (3) (a) cetacean conservation; or (b) incidental interference
7
5
0
0
238 (3) (c) whale watching
0
0
0
0
Total
7
5
0
0
Table 13: Assessments of Commonwealth and state managed fisheries completed 2010–11
Jurisdiction
Fishery
Current
assessment
decisions
Decision date
WA
Onslow and Nickol Bay Prawn Managed Fisheries
Exempt
12/08/2010
WA
Broome Prawn Managed Fishery
Exempt
12/08/2010
WA
Kimberley Prawn Managed Fishery
Exempt
12/08/2010
SA
South Australian Seahorse Marine Services
WTO
12/08/2010
QLD
Queensland Gulf of Carpentaria Line Fishery
WTO
25/08/2010
SA
Scallop and Turbo Fishery
Exempt
27/08/2010
QLD
Queensland Blue Swimmer Crab Fishery
Exempt
12/10/2010
Commonwealth
Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery
WTO
19/10/2010
Commonwealth
Coral Sea Fishery
WTO
17/11/2010
QLD
Gulf of Carpentaria Developmental Fin Fish Trawl Fishery
Exempt
25/11/2010
QLD
Queensland East Coast Otter Trawl Fishery
WTO
25/11/2010
QLD
Queensland Commercial Crayfish and Rocklobster Fishery
Exempt
29/11/2010
Commonwealth
High Seas Fishery
Exempt
07/12/2010
NSW
New South Wales Ocean Trap and Line Fishery
WTO
13/12/2010
Commonwealth
Torres Strait Tropical Rock Lobster Fishery
WTO
17/01/2011
Commonwealth
Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery
WTO
24/02/2011
WA
Octopus Fisheries
Exempt
23/03/2011
WA
Pilbara Fish Trawl Fishery
WTO
23/03/2011
Commonwealth
Macquarie Island Toothfish Fishery
Exempt
11/04/2011
SA
Lakes and Coorong Fishery
WTO
23/05/2011
Commonwealth
Torres Strait Beche-de-mer Fishery
WTO
16/06/2011
NT
Northern Territory Aquarium Fishery
WTO
24/06/2011

Compliance with timeframes (section 518 report)

The EPBC Act and Regulations specify timeframes within which decisions must be made and other actions completed. If the timeframes are not met, then in accordance with section 518 of the EPBC Act a statement must be provided setting out the reasons for the delay. Things that were not done within statutory timeframes in 2010–11 are listed in Tables 14 and 15 below.

Table 14: Referrals, assessments and approvals in 2010–11
Section
Total
Late
Reasons for delay
75(5) Controlled action determination
389
119
Administrative delays and further information and consultation required
77(1) Controlled action determination notice
385
13
Administrative delays
88(1) Assessment approach decision
124
50
Administrative delays
88(2) Assessment approach decision and controlled action determination made on the same day
124
8
Administrative delays and delays in waiting for relevant states to provide advice as to whether or not the project would be assessed under a bilateral agreement
91(1) Notice of decision on assessment approach
144
11
Administrative delays
95(2) Direction to publish
59
11
Administrative delays
95A(2) Request for further information
66
6
Administrative delays and further information and consultation required
95A(3) Direction to publish
59
11
Administrative delays and further information and consultation required
95C(2) Recommendation report
51
7
Further information and consultation required
100(2) Recommendation report
6
1
Administrative delays
101A(4)(a) Provide Environmental Impact Statement guidelines to designated proponent
2
2
Need to consult with the state
101A(4)(b) Provide Environmental Impact Assessment guidelines to designated proponent
5
2
Administrative delays and further information and consultation required
130(1) Approval decision (pre-amendment)
1
1
Administrative delays
130(1B) Timing of decision on approval
104
27
Administrative delays and further information and consultation required
156B(1) Decision whether to accept a varied proposal
17
2
Administrative delays
156F(5) Publication of notice relating to change of person proposing to take action
9
3
Administrative delays
170A(c) Publication of information relating to assessments: controlled action decisions
385
13
Administrative delays
170A(d) Publication of information relating to assessments: decisions on assessment approach
144
11
Administrative delays
170A(e) Publication of information relating to assessments: preliminary documentation
77
21
Administrative delays
170A(f) Publication of information relating to assessments: guidelines
6
1
Administrative delays
170A(h) Publication of information relating to assessments: reports or statements
22
6
Administrative delays
170A(i) Publication of information relating to assessments: final recommendation report
27
7
Administrative delays
170A(ia) Publication of information relating to assessments: recommendation reports
59
40
Administrative delays
170A(j) Publication of information relating to assessments: other matters
103
1
Administrative delays
Table 15: Other provisions
Section
Total
Late
Reasons for delay
194Q(3) Decision whether to include item
53
2
Administrative delays
266B(6) Approved conservation advice for listed threatened species and listed threatened ecological communities
53
53
Administrative delays
303CI Time limit for making permit decisions – CITES
1 060
1
Administrative delays
303EG(1) Timing of decision about proposed amendment of list
7
4
Administrative delays
Back to top

Appendix B—Committees

Threatened Species Scientific Committee

The committee advises the minister on the amendment and updating of the EPBC Act’s lists of threatened species, threatened ecological communities, and key threatening processes, and on the making or adoption of recovery plans and threat abatement plans.

Table 16: Membership of the Threatened Species Scientific Committee at 30 June 2011
Membership
Associate Professor Peter Harrison
Dr Andrea Taylor
Dr Bill Humphreys
Dr Tony Lewis
Dr John Woinarski
Dr Rosemary Purdie
Mr Guy Fitzhardinge
Associate Professor Keith Walker
Dr Gordon Guymer

The position of chair of the committee was vacant at 30 June 2011 following the retirement of Associate Professor Bob Beeton.

Indigenous Advisory Committee

The Indigenous Advisory Committee established under section 505B of the EPBC Act provides advice to the minister on the operation of the EPBC Act by incorporating Indigenous people’s knowledge of land management and the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.

Table 17: Membership of the Indigenous Advisory Committee at 30 June 2011
Membership
Ms Melissa George (Chair)
Ms Chrissy Grant (Deputy Chair)
Mr Jason Field
Mr Dave Johnston
Mr Frank Loban
Mr Damein Bell
Ms Francine McCarthy
Mr Joe Morrison
Mr Kado Muir
Mr Daniel Oades
Mr Klynton Wanganeen
[Vacant position]
Back to top

Appendix C—2010–11 publications

Guidelines and policy statements

EPBC Act policy statement 3.25—Referral guidelines for the endangered northern quoll, Dasyurus hallucatus

EPBC Act policy statement 3.26—Referral guidelines for the vulnerable black-eyed susan, Tetratheca juncea

EPBC Act policy statement 3.31—Cumberland Plain Shale Woodlands and Shale-Gravel Transition Forest – a guide to identifying and protecting the nationally threatened ecological community

EPBC Act policy statement 5.1—Magnetic Island, Queensland (Region)

Guidelines for Section 516A reporting—Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

EPBC Act—Draft referral guidelines for the endangered southern brown bandicoot (eastern), Isoodon obesulus obesulus

EPBC Act policy statement 3.28—Referral guidelines for the vulnerable striped legless lizard, Delma impar

EPBC Act—Draft referral guidelines for the nationally listed Brigalow Belt reptiles

EPBC Act—Survey guidelines for detecting Australia’s threatened fish 

EPBC Act—Survey guidelines for Australia’s threatened mammals

EPBC Act—Survey guidelines for Australia’s threatened reptiles

Australia’s in situ recovery uranium mining best practice guide: groundwaters, residues and radiation protection—guide

Pamphlets, factsheets and other publications

Advice on the presence of hybrids in listed ecological communities

Bushfire management and national environment law—fact sheet

Compliance audits completed during 2010—summary of findings

Compliance audits completed during 2011—summary of findings

Farming and national environment law—fact sheet

Farming and nationally protected coolibah—black box woodlands—fact sheet

Farming and nationally protected grey box woodlands and grasslands—fact sheet

Farming and nationally protected New England peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) grassy woodlands—fact sheet

How does national environmental law apply to the natural disasters clean-up?—fact sheet

How does the listing of gamba grass and four other grasses as a key threatening process affect me?—Q&A

National environment law—project assessments basics—fact sheet

Northern Territory cattle production and national environment law—fact sheet

Oil and gas industry and national environment law—fact sheet

Protecting Australia’s world heritage properties—fact sheet

Rumours, myths and misconceptions...farming and national environment law—fact sheet

Strategic assessments frequently asked questions

A brochure on wildlife trade and CITES (jointly produced in collaboration with the New Zealand CITES Management Authority) was translated into Bislama (Vanuatu)

If in doubt–check it out—does your luggage break wildlife laws?—updated brochure

If in doubt–check it out—luggage tags to promote the message of wildlife trade regulations to travellers.

Back to top

Appendix D—Key threatening processes and threat abatement plans

Table 18: Key threatening processes and threat abatement plans
Key threatening process
Date of effect
Threat abatement plan required?
Approved threat abatement plan
Competition and land degradation by rabbits
16 July 2000
Yes
2008
Competition and land degradation by unmanaged goats
16 July 2000
Yes
2008
Dieback caused by the root-rot fungus (Phytophthora cinnamomi)
16 July 2000
Yes
2001*
Incidental catch (bycatch) of sea turtles during coastal otter-trawling operations within Australian waters north of 28 degrees south
4 April 2001
No
Incidental catch (or bycatch) of seabirds during oceanic longline fishing operations
16 July 2000
Yes
2006
Infection of amphibians with chytrid fungus resulting in chytridiomycosis
23 July 2002
Yes
2006
Injury and fatality to vertebrate marine life caused by ingestion of, or entanglement in, harmful marine debris
13 August 2003
Yes
2009
Invasion of northern Australia by gamba grass and other introduced grasses
16 September 2009
Yes**
Land clearance
4 April 2001
No
Loss and degradation of native plant and animal habitat by invasion of escaped garden plants, including aquatic plants
8 January 2010
No
Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem integrity following invasion by the yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes) on Christmas Island, Indian Ocean
12 April 2005
No#
2006#
Loss of terrestrial climatic habitat caused by anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases
4 April 2001
No
Predation by European red fox
16 July 2000
Yes
2008
Predation by exotic rats on Australian offshore islands of less than 1000 square kilometres (100 000 hectares)
29 March 2006
Yes
2009
Predation by feral cats
16 July 2000
Yes
2008
Predation, habitat degradation, competition and disease transmission by feral pigs
6 August 2001
Yes
2005
Psittacine Circoviral (beak and feather) Disease affecting endangered psittacine species
4 April 2001
Yes
2005
The biological effects, including lethal toxic ingestion, caused by cane toads (Bufo marinus)
12 April 2005
Yes
2011
The reduction in the biodiversity of Australian native fauna and flora due to the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (fire ant)
2 April 2003
No#
2006#

*  This threat abatement plan was disallowed in the Senate on 17 November 2009. Until such time as a new or revised plan is made, the 2001 threat abatement plan remains in place.

#  Both of these key threatening processes are covered by the 2006 threat abatement plan: ‘The impacts of tramp ants on biodiversity in Australia and its territories’ and so separate threat abatement plans for each are not required at this time.

** Section 273 of the EPBC Act requires a plan to be made and in force within three years of the decision to have the plan, in this case by September 2012.

Back to top

Resources

The following resources relate to information referred to in Outcome 1, Biodiversity and Ecosystems Legislation.

Assessments and approvals
www.environment.gov.au/epbc/notices/index.html

Bilateral agreements
www.environment.gov.au/epbc/assessments/bilateral/index.html

Compliance audit plan
www.environment.gov.au/epbc/compliance/auditing.html

Compliance and enforcement
www.environment.gov.au/about/publications/compliancepolicy.html

EPBC Act
www.environment.gov.au/epbc/review
www.environment.gov.au/epbc/publications/epbc-review-govt-response.html

EPBC Act review
www.environment.gov.au/epbc/review/submissions/
www.environment.gov.au/epbc/review
www.environment.gov.au/epbc/publications/epbc-review-govt-response.html

Fisheries assessment and approvals
www.environment.gov.au/coasts/fisheries/index.html

Natural Resource Management
www.nrm.gov.au/publications/books/caring-outcomes.html
www.nrm.gov.au

Back to top