Portfolio Budget Statements 2005-06
Environment and Heritage Portfolio
Budget Initiatives and Explanations of Appropriations 2005-06
Budget Related Paper No. 1.7
ISSN 1448-1219 (Online), 1448-1200 (Print)
Agency Budget Statements (continued)
Director of National Parks (continued)
Tables in this section
Section 3: Agency Outcomes
- 3.1: Summary of outcomes, outputs and administered items
- 3.2: Outcomes – departmental and administered
- 3.3: Outcomes resourcing
This section explains how resources identified in Section 2 will be used to deliver outputs and to contribute to the outcome for the Director of National Parks (DNP).
3.1: SUMMARY OF OUTCOMES, OUTPUTS AND ADMINISTERED ITEMS
The relationship between activities of the DNP and the outcome is summarised in Figure 4.
| Total Price of Outputs $'000 |
Departmental Outputs Appropriation $'000 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL PARKS | 56,729 | - | |
| Outcome 1 – Conservation and appreciation of Commonwealth Reserves |
|||
| Output 1.1 Parks and Reserves | 56,729 | - | |
| TOTAL OUTCOME | 56,729 | - | |
CHANGES TO OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS
There have been no changes to the output structure for the DNP since the 2004–05 Budget.
OUTPUT COST ATTRIBUTION
Output pricing is based on the direct revenues of the DNP and a corporate services charge, received as resources free of charge from the Department of the Environment and Heritage (DEH) calculated under a Service Level Agreement on a full cost recovery basis.
3.2: OUTCOMES – DEPARTMENTAL AND ADMINISTERED
Departmental appropriations by outcome
There is only one outcome for the DNP.
Administered appropriations by outcome
There are no administered appropriations for the DNP.
3.3: OUTCOMES RESOURCING
Outcome 1 Resourcing
Table 3.1 shows how the 2005–06 Budget appropriations translate to total resourcing for Outcome 1, including administered expenses, revenue from government (appropriation), other resources available to be used (departmental) and the total price of outputs.
| Estimated Actuals 2004–05 $'000 |
Budget Estimate 2005–06 $'000 |
|
|---|---|---|
| ADMINISTERED APPROPRIATIONS | - | - |
| ADMINISTERED SPECIAL ACCOUNTS | - | - |
| DEPARTMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS | ||
| Output 1.1 – Parks and Reserves | - | - |
| TOTAL REVENUE FROM GOVERNMENT (Appropriations)* | - | - |
| Contributing to Price of Departmental Output | 0% | 0% |
| REVENUE FROM OTHER SOURCES | ||
| Output 1.1 – Parks and Reserves | 55,860 | 56,729 |
| TOTAL REVENUE FROM OTHER SOURCES | 55,860 | 56,729 |
| TOTAL PRICE OF DEPARTMENTAL OUTPUTS | 55,860 | 56,729 |
| DEPARTMENTAL SPECIAL ACCOUNTS | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL ESTIMATED RESOURCING FOR OUTCOME 1 | 55,860 | 56,729 |
| 2004–2005 | 2005–2006 | |
| AVERAGE STAFFING LEVEL (NUMBER) | 275.0 | 275.0 |
| * There is no direct appropriation from government to the DNP. Funds of $40.808 million will be appropriated directly to the DEH and transferred to the DNP in 2005–06. | ||
MEASURES AFFECTING OUTCOME 1
Measures affecting the DNP (as reflected in Budget Paper No. 2) Outcome 1 are listed below:
| 2005–06 $'000 |
2006–07 $'000 |
2007–08 $'000 |
2008–09 $'000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director of National Parks | (102) | (209) | (317) | (317) |
| *This is a cross portfolio measure and impacts on all agencies within the Environment and Heritage Portfolio. | ||||
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FOR OUTCOME 1
The following table lists the performance information that the DNP will use to assess the level of its achievement of Outcome 1 during 2005–06. It comprises:
- overall achievement – planned performance information for the outcome overall; and
- performance information for departmental Output – quantitative, qualitative and the price.
| (A) Effectiveness – Overall Achievement of the Outcome | ||
|---|---|---|
| DNP has identified six key result areas (KRAs) against which achievements in relation to this outcome will be assessed. | ||
| KRA 1: Effective programmes are in place to identify, control and monitor threats to the natural values of Commonwealth reserves, including a co–ordinated approach to threatened species protection across the estate, with recovery plans being implemented for all species and communities listed as endangered or critically endangered. | ||
| KRA 2: Cultural heritage values, both indigenous and non–indigenous, for which the parks were declared and are recognised have been protected and conserved.the protected areas | ||
| KRA 3: In jointly–managed parks there has been an expansion in traditional owners and/or relevant indigenous enterprises providing park services and there is a greater representation of indigenous staff in management positions. We are seen as world leaders in integrating indigenous land ownership, indigenous knowledge and conservation, particularly in our World Heritage property management responsibilities. | ||
| KRA 4: Visitors to Commonwealth reserves will increasingly be rewarded with educational, enjoyable and safe experiences with high levels of visitor satisfaction. Understanding and appreciation of Australia’s protected areas and their natural and cultural heritage will be increased. | ||
| KRA 5: The range of public/private partnerships and volunteers and local communities involved in our management activities has been expanded. There will be increased engagement with and support from key stakeholders (eg the tourism industry) in park planning and management. | ||
| KRA 6: Leaders in financial management, valuing staff, service delivery of park management and providing value for money. Performance assessment strategies have been implemented to demonstrate our effectiveness in contributing to the conservation of natural and cultural heritage and community well–being. | ||
| Effectiveness in delivering the outcome Effectiveness Indicator: Commonwealth Reserves are protected | ||
| Reporting indicators | Natural values for which Commonwealth reserves were declared and/or recognised have been maintained. Populations of species listed in the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and their habitats have been conserved. Management of Commonwealth Reserves is based on best practice principles, measured through:
|
|
| (B) Performance Information for Departmental Outputs OUTPUT 1 3 – PARK PARKS AND RESERVES | ||
| Statutory administration | Quantity | Extent to which statutory requirements and timeframes are met under legislation. |
| Quantity | Number of permits considered (granted and refused) under legislation. | |
| Policy advising, ministerial and parliamentary | Quality | Parliamentary Secretary is satisfied with the timeliness and quality of briefs provided by the Director. |
| Quality | Parliamentary Secretary is satisfied with the timeliness and quality of draft ministerial correspondence by the Director. | |
| International | Quantity | Percentage of written pre–meeting objectives at international meetings achieved. |
| Quality | Extent to which Australia’s strategic objectives is achieved through international fora. | |
| Stakeholder awareness | Quantity | Information and education products distributed to stakeholders (measured by website hits, information material distributed). |
| Research, analysis and evaluation | Quantity | Number of research reports, articles and papers prepared and publicly released. |
| Price | $56.729m | |
EVALUATIONS FOR OUTCOME 1
There are no evaluations planned for 2005–06 for the DNP.
Budget statements
Before you download
Most publications are available as PDF files. Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files.
If you are unable to access a publication, please contact us to organise a suitable alternative format.
Key
Links to another web site
Opens a pop-up window
