The effects of artificial sources of water on rangeland biodiversity
Final report
Jill Landsberg, Craig D. James, Stephen R. Morton, Trevor J. Hobbs, Jacqui Stol, Alex Drew and Helen Tongway
CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology
Biodiversity Convention and Strategy Section of the Biodiversity Group, Environment Australia, January 1997
ISBN 0 6422 7010 4
List of figures
- Figure 1.3.1.1 Location of the grazing gradients
- Figure 1.3.3.1 The NT mulga gradient showing sites 1 (upper), 4 (middle) and 6 (lower)
- Figure 1.3.3.2 The NSW mulga gradient showing sites 1 (upper), 3 (middle) and 6 (lower)
- Figure 1.3.3.3 The Qld mulga gradient showing sites 1 (upper), 4 (middle) and 6 (lower)
- Figure 1.3.3.4 The Qld gidgee/ chenopod gradient showing sites 1 (upper), 4 and 6 (lower)
- Figure 1.3.3.5 The WA chenopod/ acacias gradient showing sites 1 (upper), 4 and 6 (lower)
- Figure 1.3.3.6 The SA chenopod/ myall gradient showing sites 1 (upper), 3 and 6 (lower)
- Figure 1.3.3.7 The SA chenopod gradient showing sites 1 (upper), 4 (middle) and 6 (lower)
- Figure 1.3.3.8 The WA chenopod gradient showing sites 1 (upper), 4 (middle) and 6 (lower)
- Figure 1.4.1.1 Location of sites, landscape strata and sample replicates along a gradient
- Figure 3.1.1 Variation in the major categories of ground cover at the NT mulga gradient
- Figure 3.1.2 Variation in the major categories of ground cover at the NSW mulga gradient
- Figure 3.1.3 Variation in the major categories of ground cover at the QLD mulga gradient
- Figure 3.1.4 Variation in the major categories of ground cover at the QLD gidgee/chenopod gradient
- Figure 3.1.5 Variation in the major categories of ground cover at the WA chenopod/acacias gradient
- Figure 3.1.6 Variation in the major categories of ground cover at the SA chenopod/myall gradient
- Figure 3.1.7 Variation in the major categories of ground cover at the SA chenopod gradient
- Figure 3.1.8 Variation in the major categories of ground cover at the WA chenopod gradient
- Figure 3.2.1 Graphs of polynomial regressions of species richness against distance from artificial water point for the four relationships with the highest r²-values
- Figure 3.3.1.1 Relationships between abundance and distance from water for the grazing response groups identified by regression analysis of correspondence groups
- Figure A1.1 Artesian and sub-artesian water basins in Australia
- Figure A2.1 Distribution of all water points named on the 1:250,000 and 1:100,000 topographic maps covering mainland Australia