Key departmental publications, e.g. annual reports, budget papers and program guidelines are available in our online archive.
Much of the material listed on these archived web pages has been superseded, or served a particular purpose at a particular time. It may contain references to activities or policies that have no current application. Many archived documents may link to web pages that have moved or no longer exist, or may refer to other documents that are no longer available.
Prepared by the Ecologically Sustainable Development Steering Committee
Endorsed by the Council of Australian Governments
ISBN 0 644 27253 8
Part 4 Future Development of ESD in Australia - Chapter 31
To develop and use decision making processes which facilitate effective conflict management and dispute resolution, in the context of ESD issues
Governments will promote incentive structures that are capable of better accommodating environmental values, and will work to ensure that resource allocation mechanisms and ESD-related decision making processes are accessible, transparent, predictable and timely.
- to reduce the occasions for conflict to arise in relation to ESD-related decisions, actions and initiatives
- improve the efficiency and transparency of environmental resource allocation
- seek to reflect environmental values in the pricing mechanisms governing the distribution of relevant resources
- apply ESD principles to regulatory frameworks governing significant environmental resource allocation decisions
- to reduce and, where possible, resolve community conflicts over environmental resources
- when reviewing relevant regulatory frameworks, investigate the potential for inclusion of non- legal conflict resolution mechanisms such as voluntary mediation
- examine, in conjunction with the Australian Local Government Association, the feasibility of integrating non-legal conflict resolution mechanism into the decision-making systems of local government
- progressively ensure that, where regulatory decisions allocate significant environmental resources:
- stakeholders and decision makers have access to information regarding the potential scientific, economic and social values of the resources over time, of a quality matching the importance of the resource allocation decision;
- the level of assessment is appropriate to the degree of scientific, economic and social significance;
- basic principles underpinning decision making are explicit, and decisions are accountable against those principles;
- assessment and decision process are coordinated, transparent, and do not involve duplication;
- final decisions by government or authorities, where conflict remains, are transparent and made within a timetable which stakeholders understand; and
- major stakeholders have access to efficient appeals processes where they can seek reviews of decisions