Compiler and date details
August 2011 - Penelope Greenslade, Environmental Management, School of Science and Engineering, the University of Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria 3350, Australia
2007 - updated, Penelope Greenslade with assistance from J. Trueman, Australian National University, Canberra
1994 - Penelope Greenslade, School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
The Collembola are minute arthropods. Together with the Diplura and Protura, they are sometimes grouped as the entognathous Hexapoda. The Collembola and Protura are now considered to be classes within the Arthropoda with a close relationship with firstly, the Insecta and secondly, the Crustacea. Although Collembola are not now considered to be insects (Kristensen 1991), for convenience they are often grouped with them. Molecular studies are now beginning to shed light on the relationships of classes within the Arthropoda but so far have not produced definitive results. However, the monophyly of hexapoda on mophological grounds is accepted by several authors (Cameron et al. 2004; Gullan & Cranston 2000; Luan et al. 2005).
For many years Collembola were considered to be primitive insects on the basis of their having, like insects, a pair of antennae inserted anteriorly on the head, a thorax with three pairs of legs, and a segmented abdomen with appendages. However, they differ from insects in several features: they are soft-bodied; the mouthparts are internal and enclosed in extensions of the labrum, labium and plicae orales; wings, malpighian tubules and metamorphosis are absent; the abdomen is always primitively six segmented; tracheae are rarely present; and there is, primitively, a springing organ or furca ventrally, arising from abdominal segment IV. The furca at rest is flexed forward against the body and held in place by a hooked organ, the tenaculum, inserted ventrally on abdominal segment III. Another unique feature of Collembola is the ventral tube on abdominal segment I, which carries a pair of extrusible sacs that are involved in water and salt regulation and, in some species, functions as an adhesive organ. In common with Protura, 'salivary' glands are present in the head. These glands have ducts that connect to the buccal cavity. There are also a pair of nephridia in the head that empty via a duct to a ventral groove which leads to the ventral tube.
Although directional locomotion is by walking, when disturbed, Collembola can leap considerable distances by rapidly releasing the furca,. After its release, a combination of muscular and hydrostatic forces extends the furca, causing it to hit the ground with force and project the animal a considerable distance into the air. There is some evidence that leaping is partly, at least, directional.
The general anatomy of the Collembola is dealt with in detail by Denis (1949), Schaller (1970), Manton (1972) and Hopkins (1997). Greenslade (1991) briefly describes the morphology of the group in relation to the taxonomy and ecology of the Australian fauna. A series of comprehensive volumes revising and updating Gisin's (1960) Collembolenfauna Europas is being published by the Görlitz Museum in Germany, edited by W. Dunger. Those on the Tullbergiinae, the Symphypleona, the Isotomidae and the Hypogastruridae are already published and the remainder of the families will appear shortly.
Collembola are essentially inhabitants of the soil and soil surface and are almost ubiquitous. They are often extremely abundant, even in habitats considered to be inhospitable for most other terrestrial invertebrates. Examples are the marine littoral zone, the surface of still, fresh water, on or under snow in montane and polar environments, and in deserts and caves. Maximum densities in soil and litter have been recorded of over half a million individuals per square metre (Massoud 1971a; P. Greenslade, unpublished results) but, in Australia, densities usually range from 2,000-30,000 per square metre depending on habitat, season and climate. Highest numbers are found in organic rich, humid environments, such as soil and leaf litter of forests, arable land and improved pastures. The lowest densities, if only active individuals are counted, occur in arid environments.
Life histories are simple since there is no metamorphosis. Eggs are generally laid in soil or leaf litter and hatch in a few days. The first instar closely resembles the adult in general appearance, but has fewer setae and a relatively undifferentiated cuticle. The second and third instars become progressively more similar to the adult in chaetotaxy until, after five to seven instars, sexually mature individuals appear. Development time from egg through to adult can take as little as one week in a few species, but is normally three to five weeks but in colder climates, such as polar regions, can take much longer. Adults usually continue to grow and moult throughout life. Fertilisation in most families takes place indirectly: the male deposits a stalked sperm sac for the female to take up. Synchronised aggregation at the time of moulting suffices to ensure that this occurs. In other families, an elaborate dance, instigated by the male, stimulates receptivity of the female. In some taxa, males are highly sexually dimorphic possessing structures that enable them to hold the female, often by entwining antennae.
Collembola feed primarily on micro-organisms such as fungi, bacteria, algae and yeasts. They do not normally feed directly on sterile, dead or live organic matter, and decomposer micro-organisms are necessary to stimulate feeding. The mouthparts in all families, except the Neanuridae, Brachystomellidae and Odontellidae, are similar and consist of a pair of mandibles with apical teeth and a posterior, ridged, molar plate, and maxillae with lamellae and teeth. In the Neanuridae a trend towards external digestion may be associated with simplification of mouthparts. Some neanurid taxa are carnivorous on Protozoa, rotifers and/or nematodes, others are saprophagous. A few species, including the clover springtail (or lucerne flea), Sminthurus viridis Linnaeus (Sminthuridae), feed on live plants, and some Onychiuridae can feed on plant roots. Collembola are able to feed selectively on micro-organisms and some members of the Brachystomellidae are specialised feeders on fungal fruiting bodies, at least during some parts of their life cycle.
There is some evidence to show that Collembola affect soil processes by grazing on micro-organisms. They are believed to act as catalysts in distributing micro-organisms, so contributing to the breakdown of organic matter, increasing the rate of cycling of plant nutrients and enhancing soil fertility and structure. They are also known to feed on fungal root pathogens, such as Rhyzoctonia, and may exert a measure of disease control. Alternatively, a few fungi are known to possess protective mechanisms against predation and are lethal to Collembola. Passive dispersal to new habitats can be by means of wind or water currents. Phoresy is unknown in the group.
The physiology of Collembola is becoming better known (Joosse & Verhoef 1987; Hopkins 1997). For instance, studies on the ability of cold climate species to supercool, and of cryptobiosis in species in xeric habitats have been made. Certain species are able to detoxify insecticides, are fairly immune to radiation damage and can tolerate heavy metal pollution by eliminating chelated metals during ecdysis. Others can regulate water and salt losses over a fairly wide range of conditions. A relatively recent development is that of the use of some Collembola species in ecotoxicology and a considerable literature is developing on the topic (Fountain & Hopkins 2005).
Predators of Collembola include mesostigmatid Acari, Formicidae, Coleoptera, Hemiptera and Araneae. Some beetles have developed elaborate devices for trapping jumping Collembola and certain ants lure Collembola by secreting an attractant chemical. Collembola can avoid capture by leaping, by cryptic colouration or morphology associated with immobility, or by producing a noxious secretion.
Collembola are a convenient and sensitive group for use in environmental assessment because of their ubiquity, short life cycles, abundance and close association to the soil. They are especially valuable in monitoring subtle habitat changes.
Many Collembola genera have a worldwide distribution and this applies to about half of the 133 genera and subgenera currently known in Australia. Only 22 are endemic, although this is probably an underestimate since the generic classification in some families, particularly the Neanuridae, requires revision. Genera with extra-Australian distributions include a northern group in Australia with oriental affinities and a southern Gondwanan group allied to the New Zealand and South American, even southern African faunas. There are also genera which show relationships with faunas of the southwest Pacific or Madagasca. The biogeography of the Australian arid zone and Tasmanian faunas at the generic level is discussed by Greenslade (1982, 1987). Recent phylogeographic studies in Australia using molecular data are showing that single species may be variable, differences being related to past climate and topographic changes (Garrick et al. 2004). This work has the potential to make a significant contribution to understanding evolutionary processes and paleoclimatic events.
SIZE OF THE ORDER
When Salmon (1964, 1965) published his index of world Collembola 3,424 species and 396 genera were described. Four years later Rapoport (1971) estimated that this number had increased to 3,874 species and 416 genera. Janssens (2007) lists 7,833 species but no doubt many synonyms are included. Hopkins (1997) listed 348 genera and estimated the world fauna at 50,000 species including all undescribed species. In the present Catalogue of the Australian fauna, 133 genera and subgenera and 367 species and subspecies (about 78 introduced) are recorded, an increase of nearly 10% since 1993. There are, in addition, a small number of genera mentioned in the introductions to families that are represented only by undescribed species. Australia has probably just under 5% of the described world species and about a third of the described genera. I estimate, however, that the total number of species of Collembola in Australia is around 2,000. The figure of 1,630 species given by Greenslade (1991) is a conservative estimate.
Recent significant books published on Collembola are, for biology, Hopkins (1997) and, for taxonomy, the Synopses of Palaearctic Faunas (ed. Dunger, 1999–2004).
Lubbock (1899) recorded the first two Collembola from Australia, Anoura dendyi and Anoura tasmaniae, both from Tasmania. The next taxonomic studies of Australian Collembola published were the pioneer works of Schött (1917) and Womersley (1932-1942). Schött worked in Sweden on a collection of Collembola made mainly in northern Queensland during the Mjöberg expedition of 1911 to 1913. The greater part of this material is deposited in the Naturhistoriske Riksmuseum, Stockholm. A smaller representative collection has been deposited in the collection of the South Australian Museum, Adelaide. Part of Schött's Australian material is also in the National Museum of New Zealand, Wellington.
Womersley was brought to Australia from England by R.J. Tillyard of CSIRO to work on the clover springtail in Western Australia. Two years later he was appointed entomologist in the South Australian Museum, where he worked and published on the taxonomy of Australian Collembola and mites until his death in 1962. Womersley's collection is deposited in institutions in Perth, Adelaide and Canberra, with most of his material in the South Australian Museum.
After Womersley, little work was carried out on the taxonomy of the native collembolan fauna until the 1970s. R. Yosii (who in all papers published from 1980 to the present day, changed the spelling of his name to Yoshii) published on the neanurid Collembola in the South Australian Museum (Yosii 1966) but his other work has concentrated on other parts of the western Pacific region and southeast Asia. M.M.H. Wallace contributed to the chapter on entognathous hexapods in The Insects of Australia (Wallace & Mackerras 1970) and to its Supplement (Wallace 1974) and published on the ecology of the pest species, Sminthurus viridis.
The major contributor in recent years has been Penelope Greenslade whose interest in taxonomy of Australian Collembola developed from ecological studies in the late 1960s on soil invertebrates. She has published extensively on the taxonomy and ecology of Collembola in Australia, the Australian subantarctic islands and Antarctica, often with other authors.
STATUS AND ORGANISATION OF THE CATALOGUE
This first revision of the Catalogue brings the taxonomy of the Australian Collembola into line with current usage. The opportunity was taken in the first edition to designate lectotypes for Schött's and Womersley's species where holotypes were not designated in the original publication and to make a number of new combinations. A few replacement names have been added to this second edition and all species described or recorded for the first time since 1993 have been added.
The family classification used here is based on that in The Insects of Australia (Greenslade 1991) and Dunger (1994-2004). The basis is that of Gisin (1960) and brought up to date by additions from Betsch (1980), Deharveng (2004), Massoud (1967, 1971b), Richards (1968) and Szeptycki (1979). From a total of 30 families, 20 are recognised in Australia. No fossil families have been found in Australia nor have four extant monobasic families. Subfamilies have not been used as they are not well supported.
New combinations: Subisotoma tasmaniensis, Hemisotoma thermophila
New replacement names: Entomobrya marginata matildae, Temeritas isabellae
New status assignments: none
New records: Brachystomella cyanea, Isotomiella cribrata, Willowsia nigrofasciata
New synonyms: none
New lectotype designations: none
New species excluded from the Australian fauna: Sinella (Coecobrya) caeca.
Citation of names
As in the first edition, names are given in the most recent combinations at the closing date for entries to the Catalogue. Genera have been arranged alphabetically within families, or where subfamilies or tribes are recognised, in systematic order within these categories. Ellis & Bellinger's list (1973) and supplement (1984) of the generic names of Collembola was relied on for the taxonomic status of generic names and Salmon's (1964, 1965) index of Collembola was used for information on the taxonomic literature. Original sources were consulted whenever possible. The only previous list of species from Australia was published by Womersley (1939). A small number of genera and species, although recorded in the earlier literature, are now thought not to occur in Australia. These species are noted in the relevant part of the Catalogue under the genus to which they belong, while the genera are noted in the appropriate family introductions.
Some cosmopolitan species in the Catalogue were described 100-200 years ago and have passed under many names during this period. In the species synonymies, however, only those synonyms which have been used in the Australian literature are listed. For the extra-Australian generic synonymies, usually only a reference is given but a complete generic synonymy has been given for some genera in order to avoid confusion. The new combinations made in the first edition were based on examination of types and are listed only if they are unequivocally in line with current usage. Otherwise a conservative taxonomic arrangement has been adopted, although some further possible synonymies and new combinations are noted.
All subspecies names have been recorded even though some may later prove to be colour varieties and consequently synonyms of the nominate species. Most of the subspecies currently known from Australia were described by either Schött or Womersley. Womersley used the term variety or form rather than subspecies or race. Since his descriptions were all published before 1961 they are automatically elevated to subspecific rank (ICZN Art. 45g). If they were described from the same collection (date, locality) as the nominate form, or if from other evidence there is no doubt that they are synonymous with the nominate species, they are synonymised here. However, if they were collected from a locality different from that of the nominate form, or if some morphological or other character as well as or instead of colour was used to distinguish them from the nominate form, they have been treated as subspecies pending future revision. Schött's varieties are also treated as subspecies; none are synonymised with the relevant nominate species since the fauna of his type localities is poorly known and there has been no recent revision of these taxa apart from by Yosii and Yosii & Greenslade.
An attempt has been made in the Catalogue to include all published records of Australian species as long as a specific identification was given in the publication. As far as I am aware, the list is comprehensive in this respect.
For information on many of the locations of depositions of types, I am indebted to the valuable catalogues of Weidner (1962), Mari Mutt (1978) and Vilkamaa (1988) from the Hamburg Museum, the Illinois Natural History Survey and the Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, respectively and more recent catalogues as listed on the World List of Collembola (www.collembola.org). From 1973 to the present day, I have visited a number of other institutions known to have holdings of Australian Collembola, both within Australia and overseas, and listed material. Depositions of types in institutions other than those visited have been verified by correspondence except where indicated. In many cases the depositions given by Salmon (1964, 1965) in his index are not correct and so all have been checked for accuracy and his references to 'hypotype' have been omitted as they have no status in formal taxonomy. When necessary, Womersley's alcohol collection has been examined for the presence of type material.
Early workers often did not designate holotypes or type localities and I have designated lectotypes and defined type localities here wherever it seemed advisable. Familiarity with Womersley's and Schött's collections has enabled me to solve a number of problems concerning the real identity of species. I have visited many of Womersley's type localities and other collecting sites and made new collections.
Schött neither labelled types of any kind nor published holotype designations and the labels on his slides give the locality simply as 'Australia'. Much of Schött's material was preserved in alcohol and in the 1950's Salmon mounted some of this material and selected lectotypes and paralectotypes. Salmon's selections have not all been accepted, because, in his catalogue (Salmon 1964, 1965), he did not publish his designations except by mentioning their deposition which was not always correct. This is considered here to be an inadequate lectotype designation. Where a species was collected from one locality only (and hence there is no problem with the identity of the type locality) and if the slide is in good condition, then a lectotype has been selected from Schött's mounted specimens in preference to that selected by Salmon. In many cases, Salmon's mounts are not satisfactory. He used polyvinyl lactophenol as a mounting medium, which tends to produce shrivelled specimens, and rarely cleared his specimens, and they are very difficult to demount. Consequently, the lectotype has been selected in preference from Schött's rather than from Salmon's mounted specimens.
Womersley's type series occasionally included several species, or even species belonging to different tribes and families as was noted by Lawrence (1968). Clearly, lectotype designation is indicated wherever this might be a possibility. Lectotypes have not been designated in several cases, however, when there is no doubt that a syntype series is conspecific, i.e. when it is from the same locality collection, date and habitat, is mounted on the same slide, and specimens are morphologically identical.
The species Womersley described fall into six groups:
1. Type labelled and designation published. This is usually for species based on a single specimen.
2. Cotypes labelled and designation published.
3. Cotypes labelled but designation not published.
4. Syntypes labelled and designation published.
5. No types of any kind labelled nor designations published where a species is described from a single locality.
6. No types of any kind labelled nor designations published, where a species is described, the material is listed from several localities and dates.
For the sixth group, it was necessary to select a type locality as well as type specimens and here the collection of the earliest date has been selected if the specimens are in good enough condition. For the fourth and fifth categories, the lectotype was selected from the syntype series listed by Womersley in the published description as it is assumed to be the material he examined. Lectotypes have been selected from Womersley material when the syntype series has been split between institutions. As noted earlier, Womersley deposited specimens in a number of Australian and a few overseas institutions. There is evidence that one of Womersley's collections deposited in the University of Western Australia was later lost (Murphy 1971). The species concerned, however, on which evidence for this was based, was probably listed under the wrong date in Womersley's original description. This is apparent from the Western Australian Museum's register where dates of accession and collection are recorded (T. Houston, in litt.). I have no evidence of other lost material except for a few small collections usually consisting of single specimens.
An attempt has been made to include all published distributional records in the Catalogue, as well as some records of reliably identified species which have not been published before, but the individual references to these records are not always given. The distribution records are based on identified material in the SAMA collection. Where possible, earlier records have been verified, or listed here as errors if found to be incorrect. As a result, some records of Womerley's are not included if the specimens were originally misidentified. In some cases, verification of Womersley's determinations has not been possible due to the poor state of the specimens or the fact that they could not be found. The distributions of very few species are well known in Australia.
The detailed ecology of the vast majority of species is unknown and the descriptors mainly used here have been the terms terrestrial, littoral or aquatic. Even the feeding habits of some of the best known species are uncertain and so have only been mentioned if known with certainty. These tend to be species of cosmopolitan distribution and apparent economic importance, such as Sminthurus viridis and Onychiuridae.
All the relevant references are given for any species which is referred to in the ecological literature for Australia. Only a selection of the most recent or important references are given from elsewhere.
I would like to thank the following people who kindly supplied me with information for this work: M. Bancucci (MHNB), P. Barnard (BMNH), P. Bellinger (SUCN), J.A. Coddington (USNM), L. Deharveng (MNHP), P. Dessarts (RIB), U. Collner-Scheding (DEIB), A. Fjellberg, P.J. van Helsdingen (RMNH), A. Jansson (UZMH), T. Houston (WAM), P.N. Lawrence (formerly BMNH), C. Leinhard (GMNH), G. Montieth (QM), R.G. Ordish (NMNZ), P.I. Persson (NHRM), M. Potapov (Moscow State Pedagogical University), J. Rusek (Institute of Soil Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences), H. Strümpel (ZMH), P. Vilkamaa (UZMH), M.M.H. Wallace (formerly ANIC), W. Weiner (KM), M. Whetton (formerly BMNH). Per Inge Persson (NHRM) checked all the Schött Australian material for me and I am particularly grateful to him. I would also like to thank the librarians at the South Australian Museum and the staff of the CSIRO Library at Black Mountain, Canberra. Rebecca Gray and John Trueman assisted with this second edition.
The editors of the first edition, Drs Keith Houston, Carden Wallace and Dan Walton, have been helpful and encouraging throughout. I am also especially grateful to Peter Bellinger, of the State University of California, Northridge. He patiently answered questions on literature and on taxonomy, he gave me advice based on his extensive bibliographic and nomenclatural knowledge of the order, and he also refereed the manuscript meticulously.
The illustrations used in the family introductions are by J. Thurmer of the South Australian Museum and are from Greenslade (1991). They are reproduced with permission from the South Australian Museum, the Division of Entomology, CSIRO and Melbourne University Press.
The first edition was funded by grants and contracts from the Australian Biological Resources Study. For my visits overseas during the years 1973 and 1976, and in 1979 I am grateful for support from the Royal Society of South Australia and the South Australian Museum respectively. My visit overseas in 1983 was supported by the Science and Industry Fund and a Scientific and Professional scholarship from the French Government. The second edition was funded by the Australian Biological Resources Study with in-kind support from the School of Botany and Zoology at the Australian National University.
The first version of this catalogue work was published on 21 November 1994 as Greenslade, P. (1994). Collembola. pp. 19-138 in Houston, W.W.K. (ed.) Zoological Catalogue of Australia. Vol. 22. Protura, Collembola, Diplura. Melbourne : CSIRO Australia xii 188 pp. The database from which the published work was derived has been adapted for the Web site. The original data base has been brought up to date using literature published since 1994.
Distribution data in the Directory is by political and geographic region descriptors and serves as a guide to the distribution of a taxon. For details of a taxon's distribution, the reader should consult the cited references (if any) at genus and species levels.
Australia is defined as including Lord Howe Is., Norfolk Is., Cocos (Keeling) Ils, Christmas Is., Ashmore and Cartier Ils, Macquarie Is., Australian Antarctic Territory, Heard and McDonald Ils, and the waters associated with these land areas of Australian political responsibility. Political areas include the adjacent waters.
Terrestrial geographical terms are based on the drainage systems of continental Australia, while marine terms are self explanatory except as follows: the boundary between the coastal and oceanic zones is the 200 m contour; the Arafura Sea extends from Cape York to 124 DEG E; and the boundary between the Tasman and Coral Seas is considered to be the latitude of Fraser Island, also regarded as the southern terminus of the Great Barrier Reef.
Distribution records, if any, outside of these areas are listed as extralimital. The distribution descriptors for each species are collated to genus level. Users are advised that extralimital distribution for some taxa may not be complete.
Cameron, S.L., Miller, K.B., D'Haese, C.A., Whiting, M.F. & Barker, S.C. 2004. Mitochondrial genome data alone are not enough to unambiguously resolve the relationships of Entognatha, Insecta and Crustacea sensu lato (Arthropoda). Cladistics 20(6): 534-557
Denis, J.R. 1949. Sous-classe des Aptérygotes (Apterygogenea, Brauer, 1885, Apterygota, Lang, 1889). Anatomie–Biologie–Systématique. pp. 112-159 in Grassé, P.P. (ed.). Traité de Zoologie. Paris : Masson.
Garrick, R.C., Sands, C.J., Rowell, D.M., Tait, N.N., Greenslade, P. & Sunnucks, P. 2004. Phylogeography recapitulates topography: very fine-scale local endemism of a saproxylic 'giant' sprintail at Tallaganda in the Great Dividing Range of south-east Australia. Molecular Ecology 13: 3315-3330
Greenslade, P. & Yoshii, R. 2000. New records and redescriptions of some Schött and Womersley paronellid species from Australia including a key to genera. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory Kyoto University 29(2): 139-155
Greenslade, Penelope 1982. Origins of the Collembolan fauna of arid Australia. pp. 267-272 in Barker, W.R, & Greenslade, P.J.M. (eds). Evolution of the Flora and Fauna of Arid Australia. Frewville, Adelaide : Peacock Press vii 392 pp.
Greenslade, Penelope 1987. Generic biogeography of Tasmanian Collembola. pp. 653-660 in Striganova, B.R. (ed.). Soil Fauna and Soil Fertility. Proceedings of the 9th International Colloquium on Soil Zoology, Moscow, August 1985. Moscow : Nauka.
Greenslade, Penelope J. 1991. Collembola (Springtails). pp. 252-264 in CSIRO (ed.). The Insects of Australia. A textbook for students and research workers. Melbourne : Melbourne University Press Vol. 1 xiii 542 pp.
Kristensen, N.P. 1991. Phylogeny of extant hexapods. pp. 125-140 in CSIRO (ed.). The Insects of Australia. A textbook for students and research workers. Melbourne : Melbourne University Press Vol. 1 xiii 542 pp.
Luan, Y-x, Mallatt, J.M.,Xie, R-d., Yang, Y-m. & Yin, W-y. 2005. The phylogenetic positions of thre basal-hexapod groups (Protura, Diplura, and Collembola) based on Ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22(7): 1579-1592
Manton, S.M. 1972. The evolution of arthropodan locomotory mechanisms. Part 10. Locomotory habits, morphology and evolution of the hexapod classes. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 51: 203-400
Wallace, M.M.H. 1974. The Entognathous Hexapods. pp. 31-32 in CSIRO (ed.). The Insects of Australia. A textbook for students and research workers. Supplement. Carlton : Melbourne University Press 146 pp.
Wallace, M.M.H. & Mackerras, I.M. 1970. The Entognathous Hexapods. pp. 205-211 in CSIRO (ed.). The Insects of Australia. A textbook for students and research workers. Carlton : Melbourne University Press 1029 pp.
Womersley, H. 1934. Notes on some Australian Collembola. Stylops 3(II): 244-246
Womersley, H. 1937. On the distribution of the Collembola of the genus Ceratrimeria Börner with special reference to the Tasmanian and New Zealand species described by Lubbock in 1899. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 40: 373-382
History of changes
|Published||As part of group||Action Date||Action Type||Compiler(s)|