Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts home page

About us | Contact us | Publications | What's new

Header imagesHeader imagesHeader images

Threatened Species and threatened ecological communities

Six key threatening processes of rivers and streams

Advice to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee on public nominations of Key Threatening Processes under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

1. Names and descriptions of the threatening processes

The names provided for the six nominations are:

The TSSC considers the names and descriptions provided to be inadequate to appropriately identify and define the processes, and thus allow assessment. A summary of the reasons for this conclusion is provided in attachment (i).

2. How judged by TSSC in relation to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 criteria

A. Could the threatening process cause a native species or an ecological community to become eligible for listing as Extinct, Extinct in the Wild, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable?

B. Could the threatening process cause a native species or an ecological community to become eligible to be listed in another category representing a higher degree of endangerment?

C. Does the threatening process adversely affect 2 or more listed threatened species (other than conservation dependent species) or 2 or more listed threatened ecological communities?

As the names and descriptions are inadequate to appropriately identify and define the threatening processes, assessment of evidence of impacts is difficult. In addition, the nominations contain general information on the nature of threat, but little evidence relating to the level of impact on particular species or ecological communities, or on the processes potentially causing listed or unlisted species or ecological communities to meet the thresholds for listing in categories representing a higher degree of endangerment. A summary of the reasons for this conclusion is provided in attachment (i).

Conclusion - Based on the non-specific nature of names and descriptions, and insufficient evidence of the impact of the processes, the TSSC considers that the nominations do not contain sufficient information to determine if the processes:

The threatening processes do not meet s188(4)(a), s188(4)(b), or s188(4)(c) of the EPBC Act.

3. Recommendations

A. TSSC recommends that the following nominations:

could not be assessed and are not eligible at this stage for listing as Key Threatening Processes under the EPBC Act.

B.The TSSC intends to follow up ways to improve the nominations with the nominator.

Attachment (i) Review of information provided and reasons for rejection of the individual nominations

All nominations:

'Alteration to the Natural Flow Regimes of Rivers and Streams'

'Alteration to the Natural Temperature of Rivers and Streams'

'Increased Sediment Input to Rivers and Streams Due to Human Activities'

'Introduction of Live Fish into Waters Outside their Natural Range after 1770'

'Removal of Large Woody Debris from Rivers and Streams'

'The Prevention of Passage of Aquatic Biota as a Result of the Presence of Instream Structures'

© Commonwealth of Australia