Threatened species & ecological communities

Noisy Scrub-bird (Atrichornis clamosus) Recovery Plan

Alan Danks1, Andrew A. Burbidge2, Allan H. Burbidge2 and Graeme T. Smith3
ISSN 0816-9713

3. RECOVERY OBJECTIVES, STRATEGY AND CRITERIA

3.1 Objectives

The long term objective of Noisy Scrub-bird management is to increase the number of subpopulations and individuals of the Noisy Scrub-bird until it can be removed from threatened species lists, and intensive management is no longer necessary for its survival.

To allow upgrading from Endangered to Vulnerable two of the following Mace and Lande (1991) criteria would have to be met:

The Albany Management Zone does not contain enough habitat to support a scrub-bird population large enough and with sufficient subpopulations to meet the criteria for Vulnerable. Current (1994) numbers in this zone are estimated to be about 1100, with only two subpopulations exceeding 100 singing males. Upgrading the species' listing to Vulnerable under the Mace-Lande criteria therefore requires the establishment of additional large populations. Noisy Scrub-birds will always be prone to catastrophic crashes due to the effects of wildfire; however, the existence of several subpopulations will reduce the effect of fire on the populations as a whole.

The objectives of this Recovery Plan are therefore:

It is important to note that a major wildfire in either of the Mt Gardner or Mt Manypeaks areas would reduce the number of birds considerably (see Table 1). Since wildfires in these areas are highly likely to occur from time to time, the Recovery Plan is based on the assumption that there will be a significant wildfire in one, but not both, of these areas over the next ten years.

3.2 Strategy for recovery

This Recovery Plan will run for a term of ten years from 1993 to 2002 inclusive. Four primary strategies will be implemented concurrently during this period and are presented below.

Captive breeding was carried out by CSIRO from 1975 to 1981. This project had limited success and showed that captive breeding, while possible, would be difficult and a very expensive operation to produce the numbers necessary for translocation. While there are sufficient animals in the wild populations for translocation, captive breeding is not necessary for recovery.

3.3 Criteria

The criteria for successfully achieving the objectives are: