Assessment report of the Tasmanian Rock Lobster Fishery
Summary table of the assessment of the Tasmanian Rock Lobster Fishery against the Guidelines for the ecologically sustainable management of fisheries
Department of the Environment and Heritage, December 2001
ISBN 0 642 54859 5
Annex 1
| Guidelines |
Satisfactory/Needs Improvement (S/NI)
|
|---|---|
| Management Regime | |
| The management regime must meet principles 1 and 2 of the Guidelines |
NI
|
| The management regime must take into account arrangements in other jurisdictions. |
NI
|
| The management regime must comply with any relevant international or regional management regime to which Australia is a party. |
S
|
| The management regime does not have to be a formal statutory fishery management plan as such, and may include non-statutory management arrangements or management policies and programs. The regime should: |
S
|
|
S
|
|
S
|
|
NI
|
|
NI
|
|
S
|
|
S
|
|
S
|
|
NI
|
|
S
|
|
Principle 1 |
|
| Objective 1. The fishery shall be conducted at catch levels that maintain ecologically viable stock levels at an agreed point or range, with acceptable levels of probability. | |
|
Information requirements 1.1.1 There is a reliable information collection system in place appropriate to the scale of the fishery. The level of data collection should be based upon an appropriate mix of fishery independent and dependent research and monitoring. |
S
|
|
Assessment 1.1.2 There is a robust assessment and periodic review of data collected on the dynamics and status of the species/fishery that should include, where relevant, an assessment of the status and trends in age and sex composition. Assessment should be with a view to identification of reduction in biological diversity and/or reproductive capacity. Review should take place at regular intervals but no greater than three years should elapse between reviews. |
NI
|
| 1.1.3 The distribution and spatial structure of the stock(s) has been established and factored into management responses. |
NI
|
| 1.1.4 There are reliable estimates of all removals, including commercial (landings and discards), recreational and indigenous, from the fished stock. These estimates have been factored into stock assessments and target species catch levels. |
S
|
| 1.1.5 There is a sound estimate of the potential productivity of the fished stock/s and the proportion that could be harvested. |
S
|
|
Management response 1.1.6 There are reference points (target and/or limit), that trigger management actions including a biological and/or effort bottom line beyond which the stock should not be taken. |
NI/S
|
| 1.1.7 There are management strategies in place capable of controlling the level of take. |
S
|
| 1.1.8 Fishing is conducted in a manner that does not threaten stocks of byproduct species. (Guidelines 1.1.1 to 1.1.6 should be applied to byproduct species to an appropriate level). |
S
|
| 1.1.9 The management response, considering uncertainties in the assessment and precautionary management actions, has a high chance of achieving the objective. |
S
|
| Objective 2. Where the fished stock(s) are below a defined reference point, the fishery will be managed to promote recovery to ecologically viable stock levels within nominated timeframes. | |
|
Management response 1.2.1 A precautionary recovery strategy is in place specifying management actions, or staged management responses, which are linked to reference points. The recovery strategy should lead to the recovery of the stock within a specified period of time, or until the species recovers. |
n/a
|
| 1.2.2 If the stock is estimated as being at or below the biological and / or effort bottom line, management responses such as a zero targeted catch, temporary fishery closure or a 'whole of fishery' effort or quota reduction are implemented. |
n/a
|
| Principle 2 Fishing operations should be managed to minimise their impact on the structure, productivity, function and biological diversity of the ecosystem.1 |
|
| Objective 1. The fishery is conducted in a manner that does not threaten bycatch species. |
|
|
Information requirements 2.1.1 Reliable information, appropriate to the scale of the fishery, is collected on the composition and abundance of bycatch. |
NI/S
|
|
Assessments 2.1.2 There is a risk analysis of the bycatch with respect to its vulnerability to fishing. |
NI
|
|
Management responses 2.1.3 Measures are in place to avoid capture and mortality of bycatch species unless it is determined that the level of catch is sustainable (except in relation to endangered, threatened or protected species). Steps must be taken to develop suitable technology if none is available. |
S
|
| 2.1.4 An indicator group of bycatch species is monitored. |
NI
|
| 2.1.5 There are decision rules that trigger additional management measures when there are significant perturbations in the indicator species numbers |
S
|
| 2.1.6 The management response, considering uncertainties in the assessment and precautionary management actions, has a high chance of achieving the objective. |
S
|
| Objective 2. The fishery is conducted in a manner that avoids mortality of, or injuries to, endangered, threatened or protected species and avoids or minimises impacts on threatened ecological communities. | |
|
Information requirements 2.2.1 Reliable information is collected on the interaction with endangered, threatened or protected species and threatened ecological communities |
NI
|
|
Assessments 2.2.2 There is an assessment of the impact of the fishery on endangered, threatened or protected species. |
S
|
| 2.2.3 There is an assessment of the impact of the fishery on threatened ecological communities. |
NI
|
|
Management responses 2.2.4 There are measures in place to avoid capture and/or mortality of endangered, threatened or protected species. |
NI
|
| 2.2.5 There are measures in place to avoid impact on threatened ecological communities |
S
|
| 2.2.6 The management response, considering uncertainties in the assessment and precautionary management actions, has a high chance of achieving the objective. |
S
|
| Objective 3. The fishery is conducted in a manner that minimises the impact of fishing operations on the ecosystem generally. | |
|
Information requirements 2.3.1 Information appropriate for the analysis in 2.3.2 is collated and/or collected covering the fisheries impact on the ecosystem and environment generally. |
|
|
Assessment
2.3.2 Information is collected and a risk analysis, appropriate to the scale of the fishery and its potential impacts, is conducted into the susceptibility of each of the following ecosystem components to the fishery. |
|
|
NI
|
|
S
|
|
S
|
|
Management responses 2.3.3 Management actions are in place to ensure significant damage to ecosystems does not arise from the impacts described in 2.3.1. |
NI
|
| 2.3.4 There are decision rules that trigger further management responses when monitoring detects impacts on selected ecosystem indicators beyond a predetermined level, or where action is indicated by application of the precautionary approach. |
NI
|
| 2.3.5 The management response, considering uncertainties in the assessment and precautionary management actions, has a high chance of achieving the objective |
NI
|
Annex 2
Tabulation of objectives, strategies, triggers and indicators relevant to the ecological sustainability of the Tasmanian Rock Lobster Fishery (derived from Ford, 2001)
| objective | management strategy | performance indicator | trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. The fishery shall be conducted at catch levels that maintain ecologically viable stock levels at an agreed point or range within acceptable levels of probability | 1. Limiting the commercial catch through setting a total allowable commercial catch (TACC) and using individual transferable quotas to allocate proportions of the TACC. |
|
|
| 2. Minimising the opportunity for illegal activity through a monitoring, compliance and enforcement strategy. | |||
| 3. Limiting the recreational catch through the use of daily bag limits and possession limits, requiring fishers to be licensed and limiting fishers to one rock lobster pot per person or other specified fishing gear or methods. |
|
|
|
|
4. Conserving egg production and containing fishing mortality on spawning female lobster by the use of minimum size limits and the closure of the fishery for female lobster during the peak spawning period. 5. Restricting the size at first capture by requiring rock lobster pots to have escape gaps and to conform to size specifications. 6. Ensuring minimum incidental mortality by limiting the duration that rock lobster pots can be set. 7. Setting appropriate performance indicators and trigger points that can be monitored and provide meaningful results. 8. Conducting an annual fishery assessment reporting against each of the performance indicators. |
|||
| 2. Where the assessment of the fishery suggests that the fish stock are below the defined reference points, the fishery will be managed to promote recovery to ecologically viable stock levels within nominated timeframes. | 1. Review the strategies under objective 1 if any of the trigger points are reached. | ||
| 3. Have an appropriate compliance strategy which minimises the opportunity for illegal activity through monitoring, compliance and enforcement measures that are supported and aided by the industry. |
1. Review the current enforcement and compliance strategies in conjunction with industry and Tasmania Police to determine its effectiveness. 2. Collect statistics on the enforcement and compliance activities to ensure adequate State, regional and seasonal coverage of vessel and processor inspections. 3. Use industry sources to assist in the detection of illegal activity. |
||
| 4. The fishery is conducted in a manner that minimises the effect on bycatch or byproduct species. |
1. Harvesting and recording the catch of byproduct species in accordance with the management arrangements for those species. 2. Requiring rock lobster pots to have adequate escape gaps in which most of the bycatch species can leave the pot, while retaining legal size rock lobster. 3. Limiting the duration that rock lobster pots can be set to reduce incidental mortality. 4. Undertaking fishery independent research that collects and analyses data on bycatch species. |
|
|
| 5. The fishery is conducted in a manner that minimises mortality of, or injuries to, endangered, threatened or protected species and avoids or minimises impacts on threatened ecological communities. |
1. Requiring interaction with endangered, threatened or protected species, as listed in the Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 or the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth), to be recorded on monthly catch returns and requiring fishers to complete documentation necessary under other legislation relating these species. 2. Monitoring the recorded interactions to establish a baseline. 3. Develop a code of practice which encourages fishes to consider potential impacts on such species. 4. Protect any threatened ecological community type through the development and implementation of comprehensive, adequate and representative marine protected areas (This would be done under the Marine Protected Area Strategy being developed by the Government). |
||
| 6. The fishery is conducted in a manner that minimises the impact of fishing operations on the ecosystem generally. | 1. Develop a code of practice in conjunction with the industry which encourages fishers to consider potential impacts on the ecosystem and employ methods of fishing that minimise any impacts. |
1 The issues addressed under the principle are those that define components of ecosystem integrity
Before you download
Some documents are available as PDF files. You will need a PDF reader to view PDF files.
List of PDF readers
If you are unable to access a publication, please contact us to organise a suitable alternative format.
Key
Links to another web site
Opens a pop-up window
