Human settlements

Local greenhouse action

Motivating Home Energy Action

Australian Greenhouse Office, 2002

Fact sheet 5 - Offering financial incentives

Download PDF

SHOULD I USE A FINANCIAL INCENTIVE?

Money is not always a significant motivator in home energy actions.

Householders don't see energy costs

It's often impossible for people to calculate the costs and benefits of an energy action. People over estimate the energy used by visible appliances, such as lights, and underestimate the energy used by invisible appliances, such as hot water services.

Expenditure on energy is generally not significant

In Australia in 1993-94, households spent an average of only 2.8 per cent of net household income on fuel and power (excluding vehicle fuel). This is less than the amount spent on alcohol (2.9 per cent). Energy prices are also low in Australia. In this context, households can't be expected to engage in energy saving actions primarily for cost reasons.

WHAT ARE THE ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF FINANCIAL INCENTIVE STRATEGIES?

Estimate the likely impact of the strategy

Small-scale experiments are better at achieving this goal than survey activities.

Know the demographics of your market

Understand the difference between market-driven and retrofit home energy decisions.

Use financial incentives as part of a long-term strategy

If a financial incentive strategy is adopted, the strategy should encourage householders to think of themselves as energy savers. Click here for some ideas.

Studies have shown programs administered differently, but offering identical levels of monetary gains, often have very different success rates. Factors improving the success of your program include:

Promotion

Simplicity

Reliability

Trust

TYPES OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION STRATEGIES

Energy rate pricing

Energy rate pricing involves charging different rates for energy usage based on a number of variables. Examples include off-peak and seasonal rates. Energy rate pricing is unlikely to be successful in Australia because:

Rebates and grants

Rebates are usually more effective than loans because:

Rebate programs can be costly however, and the success of such programs varies widely. They are best used to promote specific types of energy efficient equipment.

A US experiment compared the effectiveness of different types of rebate programs. The rebate was for the 25 per cent most efficient refrigerators. Slightly different rebates were offered in different regions.

Comparison of rebate schemes

Loans

Loan schemes are often ineffective and are difficult to market. But overseas programs have demonstrated they can be of benefit to householders without the capital to invest in energy efficiency actions.

Comprehensive installation programs

Comprehensive installation programs can achieve energy savings of 10 to 15 per cent in participating households. Make it easy for householders to install a package of energy saving measures by including features such as:

Comprehensive installation programs can be expensive. To reduce costs:

Effective comprehensive installation programs must:

WHAT ABOUT RENTAL PROPERTIES?

A US report concluded landlords were only likely to take home energy actions if:

HOW DO I EVALUATE MY STRATEGY?

Surveys and in-depth interviews are the best method for measuring the effects of financial incentives and the views of program participants.

Before you download

Most publications are available as PDF files. Adobe Acrobat Reader  is required to view PDF files.

If you are unable to access a publication, please contact us to organise a suitable alternative format.

Key

   Links to another web site
   Opens a pop-up window