Biodiversity Theme Report
Australia State of the Environment Report 2001 (Theme Report)
Prepared by: Dr Jann Williams, RMIT University, Authors
Published by CSIRO on behalf of the Department of the Environment and Heritage, 2001
ISBN 0 643 06749 3
Biodiversity Status, Trends and Indicators (continued)
Indicators of biodiversity
Environmental indicators
This Report pioneers the use of environmental indicators on a continental scale. Environmental indicators are physical, chemical, biological or socioeconomic measures that are considered to best represent the key elements of a complex ecosystem or environmental issue. When fully developed they should help define the nature and size of environmental issues, set goals for their solution and track progress towards these goals (Heinemann et al. 1998). In order to track these changes, a monitoring program is essential where repeated sets of measurements are compared with a benchmark set or condition. For SoE reporting, these benchmarks must enable the effects of current programs and policies and of land/resource management activities to be assessed in relation to their biodiversity outcomes.
| Key issue: (ecosystem or taxa) |
Condition 1996 |
Condition 2001 |
Pressure 1996 |
Pressure 2001 |
Key response 1996 |
Key response 2001 |
Effectiveness of key response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecosystem diversity | |||||||
| Northern rainforests | Highly fragmented many areas degraded | No change to 1996 | Habitat destruction | Habitat destruction | Listing as protected areas including World Heritage Register; improved land management | Limited; some unique areas not protected; clearing grazing fire management and weeds still problematic | |
| Southern rainforests | Highly fragmented | No change to 1996 | Habitat destruction | Habitat destruction | Listing in protected areas | Increase in reserve estate (NSW) | |
| Tall open forests | Extensive losses in area and altered species composition | No change to 1996 | Altered fire regimes, land clearance logging | Altered fire regimes, land clearance logging | Improved management reservation | Fire management | Reserve system expanded via RFA process; initial definition of Ecological Sustainable Forest Management (effectiveness not yet assessable) |
| Acacia forests, woodlands and shrublands | Habitat loss and degradation; species diversity reduced | Habitat loss and degradation; species diversity reduced | Clearance, grazing | Clearance, grazing, altered fire regimes. Land clearance is the single largest threat to biodiversity. The situation is deteriorating as threatening activities continue | Improved land management | Vegetation clearance controls | Locally effective. Vegetation clearance not yet controlled |
| Eucalypt-dominated temperate woodlands | Widespread habitat loss; fragmentation | Widespread habitat loss; fragmentation | Clearance, grazing, salinity | Clearance, grazing, salinity | Vegetation clearance controls | Vegetation, clearance not yet controlled | |
| Savanna woodlands | Habitat degradation and modification | Habitat degradation and modification | Altered fire and grazing regimes, weeds, feral animals | Improved land management | Locally effective | ||
| Eucalypt scrubs and shrublands | Extreme fragmentation, possible inability to regenerate | No change to 1996 | Clearance, grazing | Clearance, grazing, salinity. Land clearance is the single largest threat to biodiversity. The situation is deteriorating as threatening activities continue | Reservation; restoration | Vegetation clearance controls | Very limited; reserves inadequate.Vegetation clearance not yet controlled |
| Heathlands | Widespread habitat loss; fragmentation | No change to 1996 | Clearance, altered fire regimes, urbanisation, agriculture and sand mining | Clearance, altered fire regimes, urbanisation, agriculture and sand mining | Reserves | Fire management | Limited and only locally effective |
| Chenopod shrublands | Widespread habitat degradation; many plant species endangered | No change to 1996 | Grazing | Grazing, woody weeds | Improved land management; reserves | Weed control strategies | Locally effective only. Very limited |
| Native grasslands | Many areas highly degraded or altered by introduction of exotic species | No change to 1996 | Grazing | Grazing, weeds, urban development. Altered fire regimes | Improved land management and legislation; reservation | Locally effective; reserves inadequate. Inclusion in regional vegetation planning in some jurisdictions (effectiveness unclear) | |
| Alpine and subalpine vegetation | Some areas highly degraded | No change to 1996 | Grazing, tourism, climate change (predicted) | Grazing, tourism, climate change (likely) | Reservation; improved land management | Many areas now in national parks; others remain degraded and vulnerable | |
| Salt marshes and mangroves | Extensive loss near urban areas | No change to 1996 | Habitat destruction and degradation | Habitat destruction and degradation, sediments and nutrients from land, climate change (sea level rise) | Protected areas, development control, community awareness | ICM pollution control. Greenhouse policy | Unknown. Greenhouse policy not clear on biodiversity aspects |
| Species diversity | |||||||
| Microorganisms | Unknown but population composition and size likely to be affected | No change to 1996 | Habitat modification and loss | Habitat modification and loss, unknown | Little direct response | Not known. Insufficient research or policy development | |
| Marine invertebrates | Reduction in population size of exploited species | Unknown | Habitat modification and loss, harvesting; competition pests | Habitat modification and loss, harvesting, competition pests, sediments/ pollution from land | Management plans for exploited species; controls on illegal harvesting | Pollution control; ballast water management | Pressures are continuing; very few successes. Effect of pollution control unknown; ballast water strategies taking effect |
| Freshwater invertebrates | Insufficient information to assess | No change to 1996 | Habitat modification and loss | Habitat modification and loss, salinity; climate change; pollution; water allocation | ICM; waste-water treatment; restoration of wetlands; control of introduced pests | Various policy responses. Research and monitoring | Little known. Uncertain as yet. Increasing from low base |
| Land invertebrates | Massive reduction in population size of effected species | No change to 1996 | Habitat modification and loss | Habitat modification and loss | Little direct response; protected areas | Little known | |
| Marine fish | Many important species overexploited majority in good condition | Some species overexploited; majority sustainably harvested; some status unclear | Harvesting of edible species | Harvesting of edible species, effect on non-target species | Management plans for most major species | Management plans in place for few stocks - few properly address ecological effects. Individual transferable quota systems | Management plans required in most jurisdictions; bycatch planning commencing. Unclear |
| Freshwater fish | Generally in poor condition, many species threatened | Situation worsened? | Habitat modification and loss; introduced species | Habitat modification and loss, introduced species, salinity, pollution, sediments/nutrients from land, reduce/altered flows from storages and diversion | ICM; wetland restoration; control of introduced pests | Various policy responses. Provision of environmental flows | ICM more widespread; NPI in place; control of exotics difficult. Efficacy of policies for protecting biodiversity unknown. Unclear; environmental flow provision beginning under COAG water reforms |
| Amphibians | Several species have disappeared or are declining | No change to 1996 | Sustained habitat loss but often pressures not identified, pollution, sediments and nutrients, climate change | Sustained habitat loss but often pressures not identified, pollution, sediments and nutrients, climate change | Protected areas; community-initiated protection | Lack of knowledge of causes of declines prevents effective actions | |
| Reptiles | Massive reduction in numbers in urban and agricultural areas | No change to 1996 | Habitat loss | Habitat loss | Protection areas; protection of marine and freshwater turtles | Bycatch policy | Partially effective |
| Birds | Some species disappearing; others threatened; a few increasing their range | No change to 1996 | Habitat modification and loss, predation from feral animals | Habitat modification and loss, predation from feral animals | General protection; protected areas | Threat abatement plans. Revegetation (limited direct response). Increase in protected areas in some jurisdictions | Unclear as yet. Partially effective |
| Mammals | Several species lost; others threatened; a few increasing their range | No change to 1996 | Habitat modification and loss, competition with and predation by feral animals | Habitat modification and loss, competition with and predation by feral animals, forest management; land clearance | General protection; protected areas | Threat abatement plans; species action plans. Protected areas | Pressure from feral cats and foxes continues; unclear as yet. Partially effective |
| Marine plants | Extensive loss of seagrasses; localised loss of mangroves | No change to 1996 | Habitat modification and loss, pollution, natural events (floods cyclones) | Habitat modification and loss, pollution, natural events (floods cyclones), nutrients/sediments from land, climate change (sea level rise) | Protection for seagrasses and mangroves but destruction still allowed in some areas by permit | ICM; pollution control; greenhouse policy; reservation | Unclear as yet; reserves increased in some jurisdictions |
| Freshwater plants | Species threatened | No change to 1996 | Habitat modification and loss | Habitat modification and loss, weeds, water extraction | Limitation on water licences; protected areas | Wetland restoration; environmental flows; ICM; weed strategies | Some localised advances - unclear as yet |
| Land plants | Many species endangered or vulnerable | No change to 1996 | Clearance, habitat modification and loss | Clearance, habitat modification and loss, environmental weeds altered fire regimes, grazing, harvesting | Protected areas | Weeds strategies; fire management; harvesting controls pastoral management strategies. Protected areas increased in some regions and jurisdictions | Unclear. Effective in some areas |
| Genetic diversity | |||||||
| Some species show reduced genetic diversity | While the degree of genetic diversity is unclear, it is almost certainly declining | Habitat fragmentation and loss | Habitat fragmentation and loss, GMOs | Protected areas; captive breeding; reintroduction; regulation of exploitation | Little known; research in progress | ||
The 2001 State of the Environment Report
The national level biodiversity indicators that form the basis of the report were developed by Saunders et al. (1998). A total of 65 indicators were recommended (Table 5), 14 of which related to pressures on biodiversity, 17 to the condition of biodiversity and 34 to responses to the loss of or perceived threats to biodiversity. Throughout this Report the indicators will be referred to by the numbering system used in Table 5.
| No. | Title |
|---|---|
| BD 1.1 | Human population distribution and density |
| BD 1.2 | Change in human population density |
| BD 2.1 | a | b | c | | Extent and rate of clearing or major modification of natural vegetation or marine habitat |
| BD 2.2 | a | b | c | | Location and configuration or fragmentation of remnant vegetation and marine habitat |
| BD 3.1 | Rate of extension of exotic species into IBRA |
| BD 3.2 | Pest numbers |
| BD 4.1 | Distribution and abundance of GMOs |
| BD 5 | Pollution |
| BD 6 | Areal extent of altered fire regimes |
| BD 7 | Human-induced climate change |
| BD 8.1 | a | b | | Lists and numbers of organisms being trafficked and legally exported |
| BD 8.2 | a | b | | Number of permits requested and issued for legal collecting or harvesting by venture |
| BD 8.3 | Proportion of numbers collected over size of reproducing population |
| BD 8.4 | Ratio of bycatch to target species |
| BD 9.1 | Number of subspecific taxa |
| BD 9.2 | Population size, numbers and physical isolation |
| BD 9.3 | Environmental amplitude of populations |
| BD 9.4 | Genetic diversity at marker loci |
| BD 10.1 | Number of species |
| BD 10.2 | Estimated number of species |
| BD 10.3 | Number of species formally described |
| BD 10.4 | Percentage of number of species described |
| BD 10.5 | Number of subspecies as a percentage of species |
| BD 10.6 | Number of endemic species |
| BD 10.7 | a | b | | Conservation status of species |
| BD 10.8 | Economic importance of species |
| BD 10.9 | Percentage of species changing in distribution |
| BD 10.10 | Number distribution and abundance of migratory species |
| BD 10.11 | Demographic characteristics of target taxa |
| BD 11.1 | Ecosystem diversity |
| BD 11.2 | Number and extent of ecological communities of high conservation potential |
| BD 12 | Integrated bioregional planning |
| BD 13.1 | Extent of each vegetation type and marine habitat type in protected areas |
| BD 13.2 | a | b | | Number of protected areas with management plans |
| BD 13.3 | a | b | c | d | | Number of interest groups involved in protected area planning |
| BD 13.4 | Resources committed to protected areas |
| BD 14 | Proportion of bioregions covered by biological surveys |
| BD 15.1 | Number of recovery plans |
| BD 15.2 | Amount of funding for recovery plans |
| BD 16.1 | Number of ex situ research programs |
| BD 16.2 | Number of releases to the wild from ex situ breeding |
| BD 17.1 | a | b | c | | Number of management plans for ecologically sustainable harvesting |
| BD 17.2 | Effectiveness of bycatch controls |
| BD 18.1 | Area of clearing officially permitted |
| BD 18.2 | Area cleared to area revegetated |
| BD 18.3 | Number of lending institutions considering biodiversity |
| BD 19.1 | a | b | | Number of management plans for exotic/alien/GMOs |
| BD 19.2 | Number of research programs for exotic/alien/GMOs |
| BD 19.3 | Funding for research and control of exotic/alien/GMOs |
| BD 20 | a | b | c | | Control over the impacts of pollution |
| BD 21 | Reducing the impacts of altered fire regimes |
| BD 22 | Minimising the potential impacts of human-induced climate change on biodiversity |
| BD 23.1 | Number of local governments with management plans for biodiversity |
| BD 23.2 | Number of companies with management plans for biodiversity |
| BD 24.1 | Number of species described per reporting cycle |
| BD 24.2 | Number of taxonomists involved per reporting cycle |
| BD 24.3 | Amount of funding for taxonomy |
| BD 24.4 | Number of research programs into surrogates |
| BD 24.5 | Number of research programs into the role of biodiversity in ecological processes |
| BD 24.6 | Number of long-term ecological monitoring sites |
| BD 24.7 | a | b | | Percentage of budgets spent on conservation |
| BD 24.8 | a | b | | Amount of Indigenous ethnobiological knowledge |
| BD 25.1 | Local government management of biodiversity |
| BD 25.2 | a | b | c | d | | Involvement of community groups in conservation |
| BD 26 | Australia's international role in conservation |
Source: Saunders et al. (1998).
When Saunders et al. (1998) were developing the national level indicators, each one was assessed to see if it would:
- serve as a robust indicator of environmental change
- reflect a fundamental or highly valued aspect of the environment
- be either national in scope or applicable to regional environmental issues of national significance
- provide an early warning of potential problems
- be capable of being monitored to provide statistically verifiable and reproducible data that show trends over time and preferably apply to a broad range of environmental regions
- be scientifically credible
- be easy to understand
- be monitored regularly with relative ease
- be cost-effective
- have relevance to policy and management needs
- contribute to monitoring of progress towards implementing commitments in nationally significant environmental policies
- where possible and appropriate facilitate community involvement
- contribute to the fulfilment of reporting obligations under international agreements
- where possible and appropriate use existing commercial and managerial indicators
- where possible and appropriate be consistent and comparable with other countries and state and territory indicators.
Reporting scale
The bioregional scale provides a national framework for the conservation and the protection of biodiversity and is used as the basis for reporting for many of the indicators developed by Saunders et al. (1998). The two major regionalisations used in Australia are the: IBRA (Thackway & Cresswell 1995) and IMCRA (IMCRA Technical Group 1998). In Australia, 85 IBRA and 60 IMCRA regions have been identified (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Australian terrestrial and marine regions derived from IBRA (version 5) and IMCRA, respectively.
These regionalisations are used as a framework for reporting on several of the biodiversity indicators used in this Report and are being increasingly used as the basis for biodiversity planning in Australia (see list of regions below).
Source: Environmental Information Resources Network
| Name | Region No. |
|---|---|
| Australian Alps | 1 |
| Arnhem Coast | 2 |
| Arnhem Plateau | 3 |
| Avon wheat belt | 4 |
| Brigalow Belt North | 5 |
| Brigalow Belt South | 6 |
| Ben Lomond | 7 |
| Broken Hill Complex | 8 |
| Burt Plain | 9 |
| Central Arnhem | 10 |
| Carnarvon | 11 |
| Channel Country | 12 |
| Central Kimberley | 13 |
| Central Mackay Coast | 14 |
| Coolgardie | 15 |
| Cobar Peneplain | 16 |
| Central Ranges | 17 |
| Cape York Peninsula | 18 |
| Daly Basin | 19 |
| Darwin Coastal | 20 |
| Desert Uplands | 21 |
| Dampierland | 22 |
| Davenport Murchison Ranges | 23 |
| Darling Riverine Plains | 24 |
| Einasleigh Uplands | 25 |
| Esperance Plains | 26 |
| Eyre Yorke Block | 27 |
| Finke | 28 |
| Flinders Lofty Block | 29 |
| Flinders | 30 |
| Gascoyne | 31 |
| Gawler | 32 |
| Gibson Desert | 33 |
| Gulf Fall and Uplands | 34 |
| Geraldton Sandplains | 35 |
| Great Sandy Desert | 36 |
| Gulf Coastal | 37 |
| Gulf Plains | 38 |
| Great Victoria Desert | 39 |
| Hampton | 40 |
| Jarrah Forest | 41 |
| Kanmantoo | 42 |
| King | 43 |
| Little Sandy Desert | 44 |
| MacDonnell Ranges | 45 |
| Mallee | 46 |
| Murray-Darling Depression | 47 |
| Mitchell Grass Downs | 48 |
| Mount Isa Inlier | 49 |
| Mulga Lands | 50 |
| Murchison | 51 |
| Nandewar | 52 |
| Naracoorte Coastal Plain | 53 |
| New England Tableland | 54 |
| Northern Kimberley | 55 |
| NSW North Coast | 56 |
| NSW South Western Slopes | 57 |
| Nullarbor | 58 |
| Ord Victoria Plain | 59 |
| Pine Creek | 60 |
| Pilbara | 61 |
| Riverina | 62 |
| Sydney Basin | 63 |
| South East Coastal Plain | 64 |
| South East Corner | 65 |
| South Eastern Highlands | 66 |
| South Eastern Queensland | 67 |
| Simpson Strzelecki Dunefields | 68 |
| Stony Plains | 69 |
| Sturt Plateau | 70 |
| Swan Coastal Plain | 71 |
| Tanami | 72 |
| Tasmanian Central Highlands | 73 |
| Tiwi Cobourg | 74 |
| Tasmanian Northern Midlands | 75 |
| Tasmanian Northern Slopes | 76 |
| Tasmanian South East | 77 |
| Tasmanian Southern Ranges | 78 |
| Tasmanian West | 79 |
| Victoria Bonaparte | 80 |
| Victorian Midlands | 81 |
| Victorian Volcanic Plain | 82 |
| Warren | 83 |
| Wet Tropics | 84 |
| Yalgoo | 85 |
| Name | Region No. |
|---|---|
| Abrolhos Islands | 1 |
| Anson Beagle | 2 |
| Arafura | 3 |
| Arnhem Wessel | 4 |
| Batemans Shelf | 5 |
| Boags | 6 |
| Bonaparte Gulf | 7 |
| Bruny | 8 |
| Cambridge-Bonaparte | 9 |
| Canning | 10 |
| Carpentaria | 11 |
| Central Bass Strait | 12 |
| Central Reef | 13 |
| Central Victoria | 14 |
| Central West Coast | 15 |
| Cobourg | 16 |
| Coorong | 17 |
| Davey | 18 |
| Eyre | 19 |
| East Cape York | 20 |
| Eighty Mile Beach | 21 |
| Eucla | 22 |
| Flinders | 23 |
| Franklin | 24 |
| Freycinet | 25 |
| Groote | 26 |
| Hawkesbury Shelf | 27 |
| Karumba-Nassau | 28 |
| Kimberley | 29 |
| King Sound | 30 |
| Leeuwin-Naturaliste | 31 |
| Lucinda-Mackay Coast | 32 |
| Mackay-Capricorn | 33 |
| Manning Shelf | 34 |
| Murat | 35 |
| Ningaloo | 36 |
| North Spencer Gulf | 37 |
| North West Shelf | 38 |
| Oceanic Shoals | 39 |
| Otway | 40 |
| Pellew | 41 |
| Pilbara (nearshore) | 42 |
| Pilbara (offshore) | 43 |
| Pompey-Swains | 44 |
| Ribbons | 45 |
| Spencer Gulf | 46 |
| St Vincent Gulf | 47 |
| Shark Bay | 48 |
| Shoalwater Coast | 49 |
| Tiwi | 50 |
| Torres Strait | 51 |
| Tweed-Moreton | 52 |
| Twofold Shelf | 53 |
| Victorian Embayments | 54 |
| Van Diemens Gulf | 55 |
| WA South Coast | 56 |
| Wellesley | 57 |
| West Cape York | 58 |
| Wet Tropic Coast | 59 |
| Zuytdorp | 60 |
The National Reserve System Program (NRSP) has funded additional studies for the refinement of IBRA regions and in October 2000 a set of revised boundaries was agreed by the Commonwealth, state and territory governments. As a result, IBRA version 5 is being developed and where indicated, is used in this Report.
Other national scale indicators
Two other sets of national scale indicators have or are being developed in Australia. First, ANZECC (2000a) has chosen 13 core biodiversity indicators on the basis that they can be used to report on the state of the environment across jurisdictions within Australia. Many of these indicators have strong links to those recommended by Saunders et al. (1998) as illustrated in Table 6.
The second set of national scale indicators is being developed by the ABS. These represent a small set of headline indicators based on the core objectives of the National Strategy for Ecological Sustainable Development. Six indicators have been identified under the heading in the ABS document Protecting biodiversity and maintaining ecological processes and life support systems. Those most directly relevant to biodiversity conservation focus on the extent and condition of representative ecosystems, the health of land and water systems and the number of extinct endangered and vulnerable species and ecological communities.
| Issue | ANZECC indicator | Title | Description | Links to SoE biodiversity indicators (see Table 5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threatening processes | BD 1 | Native vegetation clearing | Rate of clearing in hectares per year of terrestrial native vegetation types by clearing activity | BD 2.1 |
| BD 2 | Aquatic habitat destruction | Rate of destruction in hectares per year of freshwater and marine habitats by the types of disturbing activities | BD 2.1 | |
| BD 3 | Fire regimes | Area of vegetation burnt by frequency and intensity of burning and type of vegetation | BD 6 | |
| BD 4 | Introduced species | The distribution (and abundance) of non-Indigenous terrestrial, marine and freshwater species (plants, vertebrates, invertebrates and pathogens) identified as pests. This indicator also includes displaced or translocated native species. The identified species will vary with place and time | BD 3.1, BD 3.2, BD 4.1 | |
| BD 5 | Species outbreaks | The number (and identity) of native species outbreaks and the location and area affected | BD 3.2 | |
| Loss of biodiversity | BD 6 | Extinct endangered and vulnerable species and ecological communities | Number of species and ecological communities presumed extinct endangered or vulnerable. This indicator should be reported by major group together with the estimated number of endemic species per major group. Applies to animals and plants both terrestrial and aquatic | BD 10.7, BD 11.2 |
| BD 7 | Extent and condition of native vegetation | The area and condition of native vegetation by type. In the absence of other measures, vegetation assemblages are used as surrogates for ecological communities and ecosystem diversity | BD 11.1, BD 11.2 | |
| BD 8 | Extent and condition of aquatic habitats | The area and condition of marine coastal estuarine and freshwater habitats by type. Marine and estuarine habitat types include algal beds, beaches and dunes, coral reefs, intertidal reefs, intertidal sand/mudflats, mangroves, saltmarshes, seagrass and seamounts. Freshwater habitats include riverine areas and wetlands | BD 11.1, BD 11.2, BD 13.1 | |
| BD 9 | Populations of selected species | Estimated populations of selected species including declining species are an important measure for assessing the conservation status of species. They are also potential surrogates for assessing changes in genetic diversity | BD 10.9, BD 10.1, BD 10.7 | |
| Biodiversity, conservation and management | BD 10 | Terrestrial protected areas | Area by vegetation type in protected area categories as defined by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in hectares as a percentage of the pre-1750 area by IBRA region | BD 13.1 |
| BD 11 | Marine and estuarine protected areas | The number extent and classification of marine and estuarine protected areas (classification based on IUCN World Conservation Union criteria). Also area as a percentage of each IMCRA region) | BD 13.1 | |
| BD 12 | Recovery plans | Recovery plans for threatened species and ecological communities as required under legislation | BD 15.1, BD 6, BD 9, BD 10 | |
| BD 13 | Area revegetated | The area revegetated by species or genus. In hectares per year, disaggregated into areas revegetated using local vegetation or other vegetation and the purpose of the revegetation | BD 18.2 | |
| Marine habitat and biological resources | BD 3 | Total seafood catch | The total catch of fish (excluding aquaculture) disaggregated into: commercial fish catch (by species where possible), discarded catch, landed bycatch and estimated recreational and subsistence catch | BD 8.3, BD 8.4 |
Source: after ANZECC (2000a).
