State of the Environment

2006

Human settlements

Theme commentary
Professor Peter W. Newton, Swinburne University of Technology
prepared for the 2006 Australian State of the Environment Committee at CSIRO, 2006

Conclusions

Population, economy and environment: the need for transition to a green economy

The twin drivers of economic and population (consumption) growth have both been influential forces in urban development since SoE2001; they are forecast to continue at similar levels through the next state of the environment reporting period to 2011 (Macfarlane 2005, Trainer 2003). It is apparent that, to date, Australia has been unable to find the formula for decoupling its economic growth from the significant demands it continues to make on resource consumption and environmental impact. This key transition to decouple economic growth from resource consumption will require new technologies that significantly dematerialise current industrial processes (that is, they are less energy and water intensive), enable eco-efficient design of the built environment as well as creation of eco-industrial systems that utilise wastes as resources—this means new engines are needed for the green economy. At the same time, adaptive management by government and industry will be required to orchestrate this transition, including change in the behaviour of the population towards more sustainable outcomes (see Table 8, which mirrors the structure of the extended urban metabolism model of urban development shown in Figure 1).

Table 8: Elements of an urban sustainability framework
Direction Objective Interim Target
Using resources more efficiently Reduced ecological footprint

Increased use of renewables

Increased water, energy and materials efficiency

Reduced climate impact
Water usage

Energy usage

Waste generation

Land consumption and conversion

Renewables

Biodiversity

Sustainable urban and industrial planning, design, management More liveable cities

Efficient transport systems

Buildings designed for climate, lifestyle, occupant health and productivity
Dwelling performance and rating

Commercial building performance and rating

Eco-labelling of construction materials

Traffic congestion
Maintaining and restoring urban environmental quality Clean air

Healthy marine and coastal areas

Healthy soil

Healthy waterways

Maintain and enhance biodiversity

Increase green space

Reduce environmental noise
Air quality

Water quality

Urban salinity
Using wastes as resources Less waste and increased resource efficiency

New eco-industrial clusters that utilise waster streams
Quantity of solid and liquid waste generated reduced and the amount recovered for reuse, recycling and energy generation increased

New eco-industrial products
Enhancing human well-being Enhance social and human capital

Good physical and mental health
Health target

Income distribution target

Access to services

Source: Newton (2005, Table no. or page no.)

Settlement transitions

There are four transitions of note underway:

Settlements and environmental resilience

Assessing the extent to which Australian settlements are subject to a range of natural and human-induced hazards has not yet been the subject of state of the environment reporting, despite the costs to local and national economies and human lives. Three global hazards of recent times—climate change, biological invasions, and terrorism—raise key questions related to the robustness of Australia’s settlements to such shocks, structurally and operationally.

Infrastructure transitions for human settlements

The infrastructures upon which Australia’s settlements have developed are unlikely to sustain future urban populations and economies beyond the next generation at current quality of life levels. The transitions envisaged are from linear, centralised systems that are wasteful of water, energy and material resources to closed-loop, distributed systems that attempt to maximise collection, recovery, reuse and recycling of each resource. Specifically, the required transitions are towards:

The ultimate transition: changing individual attitudes and behaviour to consumption

The ecological footprints of Australia’s settlements are increasing at a faster rate than population growth alone would dictate, and are due primarily to continued growth in rates of per capita resource consumption. Consumption was identified in Australia State of the Environment 2001 as a key environmental challenge, and this is still the case in relation to:

Over the past decade, the wealth of individual Australians as measured by gross domestic product per capita has continued to rise (Figure 8). Consumption aspirations have, however, risen faster for many sections of the population and this is reflected in the rapid growth in personal debt, which has been in advance of gross domestic product per capita since the late 1990s. The challenge for all Australians is to encourage a transition in attitude among the population from viewing Australia as a Norman Lindsay (1918) ‘magic pudding’ (which is able to endlessly supply needs) to that of adopting a lifestyle that is less materialistic and consumptive.

Figure 8: The cross-over of materialism and environmental concern

Figure 8: The cross-over of materialism and environmental concern

Source: Newton (2005)