State of the Environment

2006

Indicator: BD-13 Examples of the impact of grazing on biodiversity

Data

Case studies conducted by the Biograze team in different pastoral areas suggest that most native species appear to be surviving well in grazed rangeland areas, and are not at risk from further pastoral developments. There are however others that are so sensitive that they occur only where there is negligible grazing pressure.

Sites where there is negligible grazing pressure are typically a long way from water points. Domestic stock need to drink regularly, especially in hot weather. They are limited in how far they travel from water to graze before having to return to drink.

The number of waterpoints is increasing because it spreads the impact of grazing pressure among several evenly-spaced waterpoints rather than just one or two. The result is a reduction in the land which is lightly grazed, and this creates a problem for the native species that are sensitive to even modest grazing impact. As a consequence, some native species appear to be in decline and others may follow.

Source: CSIRO 2005, Biograze, viewed 6 Oct 2005, http://www.cazr.csiro.au/modelling.htm#biograze

Area of pre-1750 and extant natural temperate grasslands
Bioregion Pre-1750 (ha) Extant (ha) % remaining
Brigalow Belt South 270 000 25 000 9.26
Flinders Lofty Block 1 500 000 5 000 0.33
Murray-Darling Depression 440 460 1 244 0.28
Riverina 2 750 000 26 871 0.98
South East Coastal Plain 60 000 25 0.04
South Eastern Highlands 450 000 <22 500 <5.00
Tasmania 80 098 13 617 17
Victorian Volcanic Plain 220 073 2 291 1.04
TOTAL 5 770 631 96 548 1.67

Source: Carter, O, Murphy, A M and Cheal, D 2003, Natural Temperate Grassland, viewed N/A, http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/publications/grasslands/index.html.

Over five decades of research has shown that grazing and nature conservation in alpine areas are essentially incompatible land uses, in resepct to:

Source: Professor David Gillieson 2004, Submission to the Alpine Grazing Taskforce, Australian Academy of Science, Cabnerra.

What the data mean

Grazing in areas such as the rangelands, temperate grasslands and alpine areas has had a significant impact on resident biodiversity.

Data Limitations

Data covers some specific high risk areas, but is far from comprehensive. Very little recent trend data are available on the impacts of grazing on biodiversity.

Issues for which this is an indicator and why

Biodiversity — Pressures on biodiversity - Grazing pressure 

Grazing by introduced herbivores can cause widespread damage through trampling and fouling of waterholes, selective, indiscriminate or close grazing of vegetation which in turn removes habitat of resident animal species, spreading weeds and trampling the home sites of ground-dwelling animals. Reduction in groundcover in turn exposes bare soil to erosion.

The quality of the mid-storey and understorey of forest and woodland ecosystems can be significantly modified as a result of grazing by livestock, or clearing for grazing, and simplification of these ecosystems can lead to a decline in species and genetic variability. In general, as grazing pressure increases, the total number of resident species and the populations of some of these species are reduced, reducing the overall diversity and resilience of the ecosystem.

Suitable indicators for measuring grazing pressure on biodiversity have not been developed. Research and examples may shed some light on the extent of these pressures.

Other indicators for this issue:

Land — Direct pressure of human activities on the land - Species introduction and species change 

Grazing pressure is a complex issue involving the introduction of non-native grazers and non-native pasture, as well as anthropogenic expansion of native pasture and native grazers. It is one of the principal ways in which introduced species can impact on the land.

Grazing pressure by both introduced grazers removes groundcover and nutrients from the land, often land that has already suffered substantial loss of cover and nutrients through land clearing and loss of associated biodiversity. It exposes the land to further nutrient loss through soil erosion. The loss of soil, soil ecosystems, soil nutrients and pasture biodiversity can preclude vegetation (either natural or agricultural) and other biodiversity from re-establishing.

Suitable indicators for measuring grazing pressure on biodiversity have not been developed. Research and examples may shed some light on the extent of these pressures.

Other indicators for this issue:

Land — Direct pressure of human activities on the land - Land clearing 

Although grazing is primarily an issue arising from the pressure of introduction of new species to the land (pasture, in some cases, exotic pasture, replacing native vegetation and introduced animals replacing native animals), overgrazing also has the potential to completely remove ground cover, leaving bare soil. The indicator gives a spatial indication of where this is most likely to happen.

Other indicators for this issue:

Biodiversity — Pressures on biodiversity - Invasive species 

While the term “invasive” is usually used to refer to introduced species of plant and animal that have become naturalised in a wild state, in terms of scale of impact, the invasive impact of introduced plants and animals utilised in agriculture, and especially introduced grazing animals and introduced pasture for them to graze on, is much more significant.

Other indicators for this issue:

Further Information

Source: Fisher, A, Hunt, L, James, C, Landsberg, J, Phelps, D, Smyth, A and Watson, I 2005, Management of total grazing pressure, Canberra.

Key

   Links to another web site
   Links to data in the DRS
   Opens a pop-up window

Before you download

Some documents are available as PDF files. You will need a PDF reader to view PDF files.
List of PDF readers 

If you are unable to access a publication, please contact us to organise a suitable alternative format.