Indicator: BD-14 Examples of impacts of changed hydrology on biodiversity
Data
| State | Current | 2020 Prediction | 2050 Prediction |
|---|---|---|---|
| New South Wales | 7 000 | 32 700 | 81 000 |
| Victoria | 6 000 | 11 800 | 24 300 |
| Queensland | not assessed | not assessed | 92 000 |
| South Australia | 18 000 | 22 000 | 25 000 |
| Western Australia | 600 000 | 710 000 | 1 800 000 |
| Total | 631 000 | 776 500 | 2 022 300 |
Source: National Land and WaterResources Audit 2005, Australian Dryland Salinity Assessment, viewed 6 Oct 2005, http://audit.ea.gov.au/ANRA/land/docs/national/Salinity_AUS.html
| Environmental Flow action | Successful implementation? | Scientifically demonstrated improvement in river health? |
|---|---|---|
| In-channel variation of flow | Applied on the upper and lower river system | Demonstrated ecological benefit on the Mitta Mitta River. |
| Wetland watering through delivering allocations, and enhancing natural floods | Applied on private and public wetlands. Environmental allocations achieved. | Demonstrated ecological benefit on private wetlands within the MIL area, the Barmah-Millewa Forest, Moira Lake, Werai Forest, Wanganella Swamp, and Victorian Murray wetlands. |
| Restoration of wetland hydrological regime using local structural and operational manipulation | Applied on Moira Lake and SA Riverland wetlands | Demonstrated short-term ecological benefits; overall long-term improvements in ecological health not yet evaluated. |
| Flows to disperse blue-green algae | Applied on lower Murray and Darling Rivers | Some limited evidence of ecological benefit. |
| Weir pool drawdown | Applied from time to time for maintenance at several weirs, and annually for environmental reasons on Stevens Weir; some resistance to experimental environmental drawdown elsewhere | Salinity impacts within tolerable range at Mildura for short drawdown. Salinity impacts may be significant if river flows are low or if drawdown is for an extended period. Ecological benefits not yet demonstrated at Mildura Weir or at Stevens Weir |
| Weir pool surcharging associated with flood enhancement | Applied on the lower River Murray (Lock 5) | Demonstrated ecological benefit |
| Sediment flushing flows | Applied at the Murray Mouth | Applied flow insufficient capacity, so sediment flushing not yet demonstrated |
| Mimic shape of natural hydrographs | Applied on the lower Darling River | Not monitored. |
| Temporarily open weir gates to allow fish passage | Applied at Torrumbarry Weir and Stevens Weir | Open passage demonstrated; overall significance to fish movement not measured |
Source: Gippel, C 2003, Review of achievements and outcomes of environmental flow initiatives undertaken on the extended River Murray System to August 2002, Fluvial Systems Pty Ltd, Canberra, viewed N/A, http://www.thelivingmurray.mdbc.gov.au/reports.
| No. of Sites (C'wealth owned or managed) | Number of wetlands with threatened water regimes* | |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Capital Territory | 13 (0) | 4 |
| New South Wales | 178 (6) | 38 |
| Northern Territory | 33 (4) | 7 |
| Queensland | 181 (8) | 42 |
| South Australia | 69 (1) | 19 |
| Tasmania | 89 (0) | 13 |
| Victoria | 159 (4) | 57 |
| Western Australia | 120 (8) | 51 |
| External Territories | 9 (9) | |
| Total | 851 (40) |
Source: Environment Australia 2001, A Directory of Important Wetlands in Australia Third Edition, Environment Australia, Canberra, viewed N/A, http://www.deh.gov.au/water/wetlands/database/directory/index.html.
*Source: Davis, JA, Froend, RH, Hamilton, DP, Horwitz, P, McComb, AJ, Oldham, CE 2001, Environmental Water Requirements to Maintain Wetlands of National and International Importance, Commonwealth of Australia,, Canberra, viewed N/A, http://www.deh.gov.au/water/rivers/nrhp/wetlands/pubs/wetlands.pdf.
Threats include: change in drainage due to peat moss extraction, walkers, cattle and sheep trampling, channels dug for sheep watering holes, drainage, irrigation, sedimentation, water diversion, river regulation, levees, dams and weirs, water storage, mining, saltwater intrusion, groundwater extraction, prolonged inundation (tree deaths), potentially changed flooding regimes due to clearing for horticulture/mixed farming, siltation through overgrazing, aquifer draw down caused by water harvesting from the Great Artesian Basin, road and drain construction, tourist and recreational development, altered hydrology to prevent tidal intrusion, road crossing, urban expansion, discharge from sewerage treatment plant, and disposal of saline groundwater.
Ninety percent of floodplain wetlands in the Murray-Darling Basin, 50% of coastal wetlands in New South Wales and 75% of wetlands on the Swan Coastal Plain in south-west Western Australia have been lost due to altered flow regimes.
Regulated river reaches below hydroelectric dams with rapid diurnal changes in flow and erratic flow patterns are typically characterised by low diversity macro-invertebrate communities. Sudden increases in flow can cause catastrophic downstream drift to the extent that as much as 14% of the biomass of benthic biota is lost.
Source: Arthington, A H 2002, unpublished data, Environmental flows: ecological importance, methods and lessons from Australia, viewed 4 Oct 2005, http://www.mekong.es.usyd.edu.au/events/
past/Conference2002/angela_arthington.pdf.
What the data mean
Many wetlands are threatened by a range of hydrology issues. Predictions indicate that the impact of dryland salinity will become much more severe, with serious consequences for biodiversity.
Examples of River Murray environmental flow management actions indicate that some efforts are being made to reverse the effects of altered environmental flows.
Data Limitations
Data has not been updated since the NLWRA
Issues for which this is an indicator and why
Biodiversity — Pressures on biodiversity - Changed hydrology
In the absence of comprehensive data on the impacts of changes in hydrology on biodiversity, some examples of the impacts on particular species, and on particular places where species are likely to be vulnerable, provide insights into this pressure.
Other indicators for this issue:
- LD-06 Area and proportion of land affected by dryland salinity and acidity
- IW-05 Average annual groundwater depth
- IW-06 Average annual groundwater pressure
- IW-10 Assessment of river condition indices
- IW-26 Forested streamlength
- IW-27 Extent of significant wetlands (incl. Ramsar)
- IW-28 Number of effective fishways
- IW-33 Abundance and distribution of waterbirds
- IW-46 Implementation of COAG principles
Land — Land condition - Hydrology
Changes in hydrology impact on the land both directly and indirectly via their impact on terrestrial species.
Other indicators for this issue:
- LD-06 Area and proportion of land affected by dryland salinity and acidity
- IW-26 Forested streamlength
- IW-05 Average annual groundwater depth
Inland Waters — Habitat scale influences - Wetlands
Development in many areas has resulted in reduced overland and groundwater flow to wetlands, causing dry conditions. In the absence of comprehensive data on the impacts of changes in hydrology on wetland biodiversity, some examples of impacts of changed hydrology on wetlands affected are provided.
Other indicators for this issue:
- IW-27 Extent of significant wetlands (incl. Ramsar)
- IW-33 Abundance and distribution of waterbirds
- IW-34 Examples of deterioration of condition of wetland vegetation
- CO-46 Comparative water quality of coastal lakes and lagoons (water quality gradient from north to south)
- IW-48 Ramsar wetlands with implemented management plans
Further Information
Salinity & biodiversity credits
Key
Links to another web site
Links to data in the DRS
Opens a pop-up window
Before you download
Some documents are available as PDF files. You will need a PDF reader to view PDF files.
List of PDF readers
If you are unable to access a publication, please contact us to organise a suitable alternative format.
