Water for the Future

Publications

Securing Broken Hill's Water Supply: Assessment of Groundwater Extraction and Conjunctive Water Supply Options at Menindee Lakes

Professional Opinion No 2011/02

Prepared by Geoscience Australia for the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities
2011

Download

Executive Summary

Broken Hill's water supply is currently reliant on a 110 km pipeline from the Darling River at Menindee. Substantial volumes (~300 GL) of water also need to be retained in the adjacent Menindee Lakes Storages (MLS) in order to secure the town's water requirements (<10 GL/yr) in times of drought. This is because the shallow nature of the Lakes results in the evaporation of a significant amount of water, estimated to be an average loss of 420 GL per year, with a nominal market value of some $420 m. The opportunity cost of this water evaporating each year is realised by downstream irrigators, communities and ecosystems. Moreover, in prolonged periods of drought, even this storage has proven insufficient to provide security of supply of suitable quality.

Changing the management of Menindee Lakes to provide enhanced water security for Broken Hill and reduce these evaporative losses is possible, but Broken Hill's water supply would first need to become less reliant on the MLS. To this end, the Broken Hill Managed Aquifer Recharge (BHMAR) project is tasked in this Professional Opinion with assessing whether a 'groundwater extraction-only' scheme, or a conjunctive use scheme with Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) as a key component, are technically and scientifically viable options within the priority target site south of Menindee. More specifically, the project is charged with determining, with a defined level of confidence, whether at least 3 years water supply (~30 GL), at a similar salinity to that already available for Broken Hill would be available at all times through these new arrangements. The following conclusions are drawn:

The principal recommendation is that a decision be made to proceed with a conjunctive use scheme involving MAR to provide a secure water supply for Broken Hill. There is sufficient evidence that a MAR scheme based around Jimargil would be viable. Work to finalise the MAR assessment and design of the scheme should be completed, and injection trials carried out using an appropriately treated water source. This work is required to test aquifer hydrodynamics and water quality risks under National MAR Guidelines, and to determine future treatment options.

In summary, scientific and technical risks of delivering at least 3 years water supply to Broken Hill via a conjunctive use scheme involving a significant MAR component are low. Logistic risks are also an issue in the short term, with access to finalise data collection limited by current flooding.

Darling Water Savings: Options for Environmental Filling, No Impacts, Version 2

Before you download

Some documents are available as PDF files. You will need a PDF reader to view PDF files.
List of PDF readers 

If you are unable to access a publication, please contact us to organise a suitable alternative format.